68
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
16 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID ENVigor — better noise, snow and wet. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport ZPS leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Advan Sport ZPS | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Advan Sport ZPS | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Advan Sport ZPS | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport ZPS leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Advan Sport ZPS | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 68 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 27
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Advan Sport ZPS | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 65 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport ZPS leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Advan Sport ZPS | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS | Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 75 |
| Dry | 86 | 84 |
| Wet | 76 | 81 |
| Snow | 40 | 66 |
| Comfort | 76 | 73 |
| Noise | 53 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 69 |
| Handling | 73 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS is a performance-oriented run-flat tire that earns praise for its dry-weather grip, cornering stability, and value when purchased as discounted 'new old stock.' However, the consensus is heavily polarized by significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear, harsh ride quality, and inconsistent performance in cold or wet conditions.
Pros
- Strong dry-weather traction and cornering stability
- High value proposition when purchased at clearance or discounted pricing
- Effective run-flat capability for daily drivers
- Improved acceleration and handling compared to some OEM alternatives
Cons
- Extremely short tread life and premature wear
- Harsh and noisy ride quality
- Poor performance and lack of grip in cold or wet conditions
- Stiff sidewalls can lead to a numb steering feel
Observations
- Users with high-torque electric vehicles noted better rear-tire longevity compared to previous Pirelli sets.
- Drivers of performance coupes and MINIs appreciate the ZPS run-flat technology for daily commuting, despite the inherent trade-off in ride comfort.
The Yokohama AVID ENVigor is generally regarded as a capable grand touring tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering drivers a sense of security and responsiveness. While users appreciate its performance characteristics and lateral grip, some report concerns regarding road noise levels and ride stiffness compared to other premium alternatives.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip
- Excellent lateral stability and handling feel
- Reliable performance at highway speeds
- Good value as a grand touring option
Cons
- Higher road noise levels than some competitors
- Ride quality can feel firm or harsh on certain vehicles
- Mixed feedback regarding long-term tread life expectations
Observations
- Drivers of sport-oriented sedans like the Civic Si noted the tire provides excellent handling but can feel stiff during spirited driving.
- Users replacing OEM tires on mid-size sedans like the Mazda6 reported significant improvements in lateral feel and wet weather confidence.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS | B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 180 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Yokohama
75
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID ENVigor — better noise, snow and wet. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 80 vs 53 on noise.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 66 vs 40 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 81 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS scores 76 vs 73 on comfort.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
Tire B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS also compared with
Yokohama AVID ENVigor also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.