89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Michelin Defender T+H vs Yokohama AVID S33B — Compared
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Yokohama
Yokohama AVID S33B
52
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
20/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | AVID S33B |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 64 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 41
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | AVID S33B |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 51 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 42
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | AVID S33B |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | 35 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | AVID S33B |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 66 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 21
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 53
Why this score
| Source | Defender T+H | AVID S33B |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 39 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 31
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Defender T+H | Yokohama AVID S33B |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 52 |
| Dry | 94 | 64 |
| Wet | 91 | 50 |
| Snow | 76 | 34 |
| Comfort | 89 | 67 |
| Noise | 87 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 37 |
| Handling | 92 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
52
/ 100
Tire B
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender T+H | B · Yokohama AVID S33B |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Michelin
52
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender T+H scores 90 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Defender T+H scores 76 vs 34 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender T+H scores 91 vs 50 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Defender T+H scores 92 vs 61 on handling.
Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Yokohama AVID S33B
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Defender T+H also compared with
Yokohama AVID S33B also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.