Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama Advan Sport AS vs Yokohama AVID S33B — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama AVID S33B tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
20/100
Owner ratings
Dry
64
Wet
50
Snow
34
Comfort
67
Noise
66
Treadwear
37
Handling
61

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 13
A — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
64
Why this score
SourceAdvan Sport ASAVID S33B
Professional tests (TWG score) 70 –
Tire Rack owners – 64
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 17
A — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
50
Why this score
SourceAdvan Sport ASAVID S33B
Professional tests (TWG score) 58 –
Tire Rack owners – 51
Tyre Reviews owners 73 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 26
A — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
34
Why this score
SourceAdvan Sport ASAVID S33B
Tire Rack owners – 35
Tyre Reviews owners 60 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 13
A — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
67
Why this score
SourceAdvan Sport ASAVID S33B
Professional tests (TWG score) 78 –
Tire Rack owners – 66
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 10
A — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
66
Why this score
SourceAdvan Sport ASAVID S33B
Professional tests (TWG score) 76 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 34
A — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
37
Why this score
SourceAdvan Sport ASAVID S33B
Tire Rack owners – 39
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 12
A — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
B — Yokohama AVID S33B
61
Why this score
SourceAdvan Sport ASAVID S33B
Tyre Reviews owners 73 –

Scores at a glance

Yokohama Advan Sport AS vs Yokohama AVID S33B: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Advan Sport ASYokohama AVID S33B
Relative Score 71 52
Dry 77 64
Wet 67 50
Snow 60 34
Comfort 80 67
Noise 76 66
Treadwear 71 37
Handling 73 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Tire B Yokohama AVID S33B

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Advan Sport AS B · Yokohama AVID S33B
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG440 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 71 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 60 vs 34 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 67 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 77 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tire B · Yokohama AVID S33B

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.