Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 vs Yokohama AVID S34NV — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
27/100
Owner ratings
Dry
82
Wet
59
Snow
13
Comfort
50
Noise
54
Treadwear
51
Handling
82

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama AVID S34NV if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S34NV leads by 3
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
79
B — Yokohama AVID S34NV
82
Why this score
SourceDueler H/L 400AVID S34NV
Tire Rack owners 55 81
Tyre Reviews owners 81 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Dueler H/L 400 leads by 18
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
77
B — Yokohama AVID S34NV
59
Why this score
SourceDueler H/L 400AVID S34NV
Tire Rack owners 49 57
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dueler H/L 400 leads by 56
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
69
B — Yokohama AVID S34NV
13
Why this score
SourceDueler H/L 400AVID S34NV
Tire Rack owners 69 18

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dueler H/L 400 leads by 17
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
67
B — Yokohama AVID S34NV
50
Why this score
SourceDueler H/L 400AVID S34NV
Tire Rack owners 31 48
Tyre Reviews owners 70 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
–
B — Yokohama AVID S34NV
54

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Dueler H/L 400 leads by 18
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
69
B — Yokohama AVID S34NV
51
Why this score
SourceDueler H/L 400AVID S34NV
Tire Rack owners 64 49
Tyre Reviews owners 69 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S34NV leads by 4
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
78
B — Yokohama AVID S34NV
82
Why this score
SourceDueler H/L 400AVID S34NV
Tyre Reviews owners 78 –

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 vs Yokohama AVID S34NV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/L 400Yokohama AVID S34NV
Relative Score 73 56
Dry 79 82
Wet 77 59
Snow 69 13
Comfort 67 50
Noise – 54
Treadwear 69 51
Handling 78 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400

The Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 receives highly polarized feedback, largely serving as a polarizing original equipment tire for Subaru Forester owners. While some users report exceptional longevity and reliable performance, others express significant disappointment regarding premature tread wear and lackluster grip in wet or spirited driving conditions.

Pros

  • Impressive tread longevity for some users, with reports reaching 50,000+ miles
  • Reliable performance in dry conditions for daily commuting
  • Surprising capability in light to moderate snow for an all-season tire
  • Good resistance to hydroplaning in wet weather

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting wear-out as early as 21,000 to 25,000 miles
  • Noticeable decline in ride comfort and increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Lack of lateral grip during cornering, particularly on wet surfaces
  • Performance degradation in dry conditions as the tread depth decreases

Observations

  • Subaru Forester XT owners noted that the tire's grip limitations become more apparent during spirited driving, likely due to the vehicle's higher center of gravity and power output.
  • There is a significant disparity in mileage expectations among Forester owners, with some reaching 75,000 miles while others struggle to exceed 25,000 miles.
Tire B Yokohama AVID S34NV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Yokohama

Winner: Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama AVID S34NV if handling and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 scores 69 vs 13 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 scores 77 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 scores 69 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 scores 67 vs 50 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
Tire B · Yokohama AVID S34NV

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.