Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Yokohama AVID S34NV vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
27/100
Owner ratings
Dry
82
Wet
59
Snow
13
Comfort
50
Noise
54
Treadwear
51
Handling
82

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth S34

All Season Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth S34 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
34/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
73
Wet
46
Snow
20
Comfort
50
Noise
–
Treadwear
62
Handling
43

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID S34NV — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth S34 if treadwear and snow matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S34NV leads by 9
A — Yokohama AVID S34NV
82
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
73
Why this score
SourceAVID S34NVBluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 81 80
Tyre Reviews owners – 70

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AVID S34NV leads by 13
A — Yokohama AVID S34NV
59
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
46
Why this score
SourceAVID S34NVBluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 57 63
Tyre Reviews owners – 40

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth S34 leads by 7
A — Yokohama AVID S34NV
13
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
20
Why this score
SourceAVID S34NVBluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 18 49
Tyre Reviews owners – 10

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama AVID S34NV
50
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
50
Why this score
SourceAVID S34NVBluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 48 58
Tyre Reviews owners – 47

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama AVID S34NV
54
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) BluEarth S34 leads by 11
A — Yokohama AVID S34NV
51
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
62
Why this score
SourceAVID S34NVBluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 49 54
Tyre Reviews owners – 65

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S34NV leads by 39
A — Yokohama AVID S34NV
82
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
43
Why this score
SourceAVID S34NVBluEarth S34
Tyre Reviews owners – 43

Scores at a glance

Yokohama AVID S34NV vs Yokohama BluEarth S34: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama AVID S34NVYokohama BluEarth S34
Relative Score 56 50
Dry 82 73
Wet 59 46
Snow 13 20
Comfort 50 50
Noise 54 –
Treadwear 51 62
Handling 82 43

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama AVID S34NV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama BluEarth S34

The Yokohama BluEarth S34 is generally viewed as an underwhelming OEM tire that prioritizes low rolling resistance over performance. While dry traction is considered adequate for daily commuting, users frequently report concerns regarding wet weather grip and excessive road noise.

Pros

  • Acceptable dry traction for standard commuting
  • Low rolling resistance design

Cons

  • Poor wet weather performance and traction
  • High levels of road noise
  • Mediocre handling characteristics

Observations

  • Commonly identified as an OEM fitment for the Toyota Prius, where users note that the tire's hard compound may contribute to handling deficiencies.
  • Users suggest that the tire's focus on efficiency may be the primary cause for the observed lack of grip in wet conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama AVID S34NV B · Yokohama BluEarth S34
Category—All Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama AVID S34NV — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth S34 if treadwear and snow matter most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama AVID S34NV scores 82 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID S34NV scores 59 vs 46 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth S34 scores 62 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID S34NV scores 82 vs 73 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama AVID S34NV
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth S34

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.