Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Solus HA31 vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Solus HA31

All Season Touring tires

Kumho Solus HA31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
82
Snow
81
Comfort
83
Noise
67
Treadwear
74
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
Owner ratings
Dry
82
Wet
75
Snow
61
Comfort
81
Noise
79
Treadwear
77
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Kumho Solus HA31 and Yokohama AVID TOURING-S are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus HA31 is stronger on snow and wet. Yokohama AVID TOURING-S is stronger on noise, dry and treadwear.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID TOURING-S leads by 10
A — Kumho Solus HA31
72
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
82
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 –
Tire Rack owners – 83
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –
SimpleTire owners – 95

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus HA31 leads by 7
A — Kumho Solus HA31
82
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
75
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 –
Tire Rack owners – 77
Tyre Reviews owners 79 –
SimpleTire owners – 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus HA31 leads by 20
A — Kumho Solus HA31
81
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
61
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
Professional tests (TWG score) 75 –
Tire Rack owners – 62
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –
SimpleTire owners – 87

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus HA31 leads by 2
A — Kumho Solus HA31
83
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
81
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
Tire Rack owners – 82
Tyre Reviews owners 83 –
SimpleTire owners – 94

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID TOURING-S leads by 12
A — Kumho Solus HA31
67
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
79
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 –
SimpleTire owners – 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AVID TOURING-S leads by 3
A — Kumho Solus HA31
74
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
77
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
Tire Rack owners – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 74 –
SimpleTire owners – 92

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID TOURING-S leads by 1
A — Kumho Solus HA31
80
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
81
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho Solus HA31 vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus HA31Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Relative Score 77 76
Dry 72 82
Wet 82 75
Snow 81 61
Comfort 83 81
Noise 67 79
Treadwear 74 77
Handling 80 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Solus HA31

The Kumho Solus HA31 is widely regarded as a capable and cost-effective all-season solution for drivers seeking reliable winter performance without the need for seasonal tire changes. While users consistently praise its traction in snow and wet conditions, some note a compromise in high-speed stability and road noise compared to dedicated summer tires.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and confidence in heavy snow and winter conditions
  • Strong wet-weather grip and stability in windy conditions
  • Excellent value proposition for daily commuters
  • Reliable handling during cornering and highway on-ramps

Cons

  • Increased road noise at higher speeds (70mph+)
  • Noticeable softness in the tire compound during warmer temperatures
  • Inconsistent performance feedback in dry, non-winter conditions
  • Potential for reduced performance compared to premium all-weather alternatives

Observations

  • Users report successful application on smaller, economical vehicles like the Kia Rio and Peugeot 107 for daily commuting.
  • Owners of mid-size vehicles like the Nissan Altima noted a significant improvement in winter confidence compared to standard all-season tires.
Tire B Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus HA31 B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
CategoryAll Season Touring tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available—28
Rim diameters—15″ – 17″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—620 A B
Treadwear warranty—80,000 mi
Sidewall—Whitewall
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Too close to call: Kumho Solus HA31 and Yokohama AVID TOURING-S are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus HA31 is stronger on snow and wet. Yokohama AVID TOURING-S is stronger on noise, dry and treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 81 vs 61 on snow.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 79 vs 67 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 82 vs 72 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 82 vs 75 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Solus HA31
Tire B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.