63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Yokohama AVS ES100 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
85/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama AVS ES100 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | AVS ES100 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 95 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | AVS ES100 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 89 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AVS ES100 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | AVS ES100 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 45 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 72 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | AVS ES100 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 35 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | AVS ES100 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 41
Why this score
| Source | AVS ES100 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 91 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVS ES100 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 79 |
| Dry | 70 | 84 |
| Wet | 70 | 77 |
| Comfort | 80 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 35 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 86 |
| Handling | 50 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama AVS ES100 is regarded as a responsive and engaging tire that performs well in both wet and dry conditions, particularly for performance-oriented driving. While users appreciate its handling characteristics, the consensus indicates that the tire's tread life is relatively short.
Pros
- High level of steering responsiveness
- Reliable grip in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Well-suited for performance driving and cornering
Cons
- Rapid tread wear
- Limited longevity compared to touring-focused tires
Observations
- Users report positive handling characteristics when fitted to performance-oriented vehicles like the Nissan Skyline.
- The tire is frequently utilized in front-axle applications for drift-focused driving setups.
The Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering impressive grip and stability for SUVs and crossovers. While users frequently praise its responsive steering and cornering capabilities, the consensus is divided regarding ride comfort and cabin noise, with several owners noting that the stiff sidewalls can lead to a harsh experience on imperfect road surfaces.
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
- Competitive price point for a premium-branded tire
- Even and durable tread wear
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Observations
- SUV and crossover owners generally report high satisfaction with handling and cornering stability.
- Users driving larger, heavier vehicles like the Alphard Hybrid noted that the tire's stiffness is more pronounced on uneven road surfaces, impacting perceived comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVS ES100 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Yokohama
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama AVS ES100 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 91 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 86 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama AVS ES100 scores 80 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 84 vs 70 on dry.
Tire A · Yokohama AVS ES100
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama AVS ES100 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.