Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

All Season Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
73/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
75/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
76
Snow
82
Comfort
73
Noise
99
Treadwear
55
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Dry
83
Wet
78
Snow
–
Comfort
86
Noise
–
Treadwear
75
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 8
A — Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
75
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
83
Why this score
SourceBluEarth 4S AW21BluEarth Es ES32
Professional tests (TWG score) 66 –
Tyre Reviews owners 87 83

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 2
A — Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
76
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
78
Why this score
SourceBluEarth 4S AW21BluEarth Es ES32
Professional tests (TWG score) 69 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 78

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
82
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
–
Why this score
SourceBluEarth 4S AW21BluEarth Es ES32
Professional tests (TWG score) 82 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 13
A — Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
73
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
86
Why this score
SourceBluEarth 4S AW21BluEarth Es ES32
Tyre Reviews owners 73 86

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
99
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
–
Why this score
SourceBluEarth 4S AW21BluEarth Es ES32
Professional tests (TWG score) 99 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 20
A — Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
55
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
75
Why this score
SourceBluEarth 4S AW21BluEarth Es ES32
Tyre Reviews owners 55 75

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 11
A — Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
70
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
81
Why this score
SourceBluEarth 4S AW21BluEarth Es ES32
Tyre Reviews owners 70 81

Scores at a glance

Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama BluEarth 4S AW21Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 69 80
Dry 75 83
Wet 76 78
Snow 82 –
Comfort 73 86
Noise 99 –
Treadwear 55 75
Handling 70 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21

The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 is generally regarded as a competent all-weather tire that excels in wet and winter conditions, providing reliable traction in cold temperatures. While users appreciate its performance in adverse weather, the tire receives mixed feedback regarding its longevity, road noise, and handling characteristics during warmer months.

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather grip and stability on motorways
  • Strong performance in snow and icy conditions
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality during the first two years of ownership
  • Aesthetically pleasing tread design

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in road noise, described by some as excessive
  • Soft compound feel during high-temperature summer driving
  • Concerns regarding long-term durability and premature tread cracking
  • Unusual steering feedback during low-speed maneuvering

Observations

  • Drivers of compact hatchbacks, such as the VW Golf, report acceptable dry and wet grip but note a peculiar sensation in steering feel.
  • Performance in warmer climates (30°C+) results in a 'soft' feeling during cornering, suggesting the compound is better suited for temperate or cold environments.
Tire B Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
  • Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
  • Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving

Observations

  • Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
  • Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
  • Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 73 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 70 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 83 vs 75 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.