72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Yokohama G012 A/T — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
91
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama G012 A/T — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
G012 A/T leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 88 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
G012 A/T leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 85 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
G012 A/T leads by 5
Comfort
Score (0–100)
G012 A/T leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 68 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
G012 A/T leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G012 A/T leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Yokohama G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 91 |
| Dry | 84 | 94 |
| Wet | 64 | 93 |
| Snow | 92 | 97 |
| Comfort | 61 | 85 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 91 |
| Handling | 50 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
91
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
- Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during daily driving
- Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
- Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
- The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
The Yokohama Geolandar G012 A/T is widely regarded as a highly capable, aggressive all-terrain tire that excels in demanding off-road environments, including mud, gravel, and snow. While users consistently praise its deep tread depth and rugged durability, they acknowledge that these performance benefits come with trade-offs in road noise and fuel efficiency. Overall, it is viewed as a high-value, reliable choice for truck and SUV owners who prioritize off-road traction and sidewall strength.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, clay, and loose terrain
- Deep tread depth providing long-lasting wear
- Robust sidewall construction and durability
- Strong performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Noticeable road noise at highway speeds
- Negative impact on fuel economy due to weight and rolling resistance
- Occasional balancing challenges on certain heavy-duty truck wheels
- Potential for wandering or tracking issues on paved surfaces
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (Ram 2500, F-250) report excellent load-hauling performance but note faster tread wear when towing heavy equipment.
- SUV owners (Subaru Forester/Outback) highlight the tire's ability to complement AWD systems on unsealed, rural roads.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Yokohama G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
BFGoodrich
91
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama G012 A/T — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 83 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 93 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 85 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 91 vs 80 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Yokohama G012 A/T
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 also compared with
Yokohama G012 A/T also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.