Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Yokohama AVID Touring vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama AVID Touring

All Season Touring tires

Yokohama AVID Touring tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
83 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
90
Snow
87
Comfort
94
Noise
89
Treadwear
92
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Geolandar G91A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
16/100
Owner ratings
Dry
74
Wet
59
Snow
38
Comfort
66
Noise
62
Treadwear
43
Handling
74

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Touring — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 20
A — Yokohama AVID Touring
94
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91A
74
Why this score
SourceAVID TouringGeolandar G91A
Tire Rack owners – 65
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 31
A — Yokohama AVID Touring
90
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91A
59
Why this score
SourceAVID TouringGeolandar G91A
Tire Rack owners – 51
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 49
A — Yokohama AVID Touring
87
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91A
38
Why this score
SourceAVID TouringGeolandar G91A
Tire Rack owners – 77

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 28
A — Yokohama AVID Touring
94
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91A
66
Why this score
SourceAVID TouringGeolandar G91A
Tire Rack owners – 46
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 27
A — Yokohama AVID Touring
89
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91A
62

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 49
A — Yokohama AVID Touring
92
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91A
43
Why this score
SourceAVID TouringGeolandar G91A
Tire Rack owners – 68
Tyre Reviews owners 85 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Touring leads by 11
A — Yokohama AVID Touring
85
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91A
74
Why this score
SourceAVID TouringGeolandar G91A
Tyre Reviews owners 85 –

Scores at a glance

Yokohama AVID Touring vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama AVID TouringYokohama Geolandar G91A
Relative Score 90 58
Dry 94 74
Wet 90 59
Snow 87 38
Comfort 94 66
Noise 89 62
Treadwear 92 43
Handling 85 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama AVID Touring

The Yokohama AVID Touring is widely regarded as a high-value, reliable tire that offers a comfortable and quiet ride, making it a popular choice for budget-conscious drivers. While most users praise its longevity and consistent performance across various weather conditions, a minority of users report issues with sidewall softness and occasional traction loss in wet conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong tread life and durability
  • Reliable dry and wet road traction for daily commuting
  • Easy to balance during installation

Cons

  • Reports of soft sidewalls leading to handling instability
  • Occasional wheel spin in wet or snowy conditions
  • Some users noted road noise or 'tread growl' over time
  • Tendency to track or follow grooves in pavement

Observations

  • Users with sedans and older passenger cars frequently report that the tire improves ride comfort, making the vehicle feel more stable and substantial.
  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those with specific suspension issues noted that the soft sidewall can be more pronounced, potentially impacting steering precision.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G91A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama AVID Touring B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
CategoryAll Season Touring tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama AVID Touring — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama AVID Touring scores 87 vs 38 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama AVID Touring scores 92 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID Touring scores 90 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama AVID Touring scores 94 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama AVID Touring
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.