65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
24 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — better handling, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G91AV leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 94 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G91AV leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 74 | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G91AV leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 54 | 86 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G91AV leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 94 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G91AV leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 72 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G91AV leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 90 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 85 |
| Dry | 74 | 93 |
| Wet | 66 | 71 |
| Snow | 60 | 86 |
| Comfort | 71 | 92 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 63 | 89 |
| Handling | 55 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus is a polarizing tire that excels in fuel efficiency and initial comfort but frequently disappoints users regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance. While many owners appreciate its low rolling resistance and quiet ride when new, a significant portion of the user base reports premature wear and a noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy due to low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and noise suppression when new
- Predictable handling for daily commuting and highway driving
- Good dry traction for standard, non-spirited driving
Cons
- Significant premature tread wear failing to meet mileage expectations
- Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
- Increased road noise and vibration as the tire wears
- Lack of grip during spirited driving or in heavy rain
Observations
- SUV and Crossover owners (e.g., Mazda CX-9, Subaru Forester) frequently report that the tire's sidewall stiffness and grip limits are insufficient for the vehicle's weight and handling characteristics.
- Users of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., VW Jetta, Toyota Yaris) tend to report higher satisfaction with comfort and noise levels compared to those driving larger SUVs.
- Multiple reports indicate that the tire's performance degrades significantly after the first 20,000–30,000 miles, particularly regarding noise and vibration.
The Yokohama Geolandar G91AV receives mixed feedback, often serving as a polarizing original equipment tire for compact SUVs like the Toyota RAV4 and Subaru Forester. While many users praise its quiet operation, long-term durability, and comfort, others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and premature tread wear depending on driving conditions and alignment maintenance.
Pros
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Impressive tread longevity for many long-term users
- Reliable performance in dry highway and city driving conditions
- Consistent performance across varying temperature ranges
Cons
- Noticeable lack of grip during wet-weather cornering
- Reports of premature wear or alignment sensitivity
- Tendency for wheel spin during acceleration
- Poor drainage performance in heavy rain
Observations
- Toyota RAV4 owners report a wide variance in tread life, ranging from 12,000 miles to over 60,000 miles.
- Subaru Forester users noted specific issues with lateral sliding and wheel spin, suggesting the tire may struggle with the vehicle's power delivery or chassis dynamics.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 B A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Bridgestone
85
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — better handling, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 90 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 86 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 89 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 92 vs 71 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.