Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental CrossContact UHP vs Yokohama Geolandar G91F — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar G91F

Yokohama Geolandar G91F tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
28/100
Owner ratings
Dry
78
Wet
65
Snow
43
Comfort
73
Noise
72
Treadwear
64
Handling
75
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Continental CrossContact UHP and Yokohama Geolandar G91F are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact UHP is stronger on wet and dry. Yokohama Geolandar G91F is stronger on treadwear.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact UHP leads by 8
A
86
B
78
Why this score
SourceCrossContact UHPGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 87 71
Tyre Reviews owners 86 –
SimpleTire owners 97 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact UHP leads by 14
A
79
B
65
Why this score
SourceCrossContact UHPGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 82 62
Tyre Reviews owners 79 –
SimpleTire owners 90 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
43
Why this score
SourceCrossContact UHPGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners – 82
SimpleTire owners 75 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91F leads by 1
A
72
B
73
Why this score
SourceCrossContact UHPGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 82 47
Tyre Reviews owners 72 –
SimpleTire owners 97 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
72
Why this score
SourceCrossContact UHPGeolandar G91F
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91F leads by 11
A
53
B
64
Why this score
SourceCrossContact UHPGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners 66 77
Tyre Reviews owners 53 –
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91F leads by 1
A
74
B
75
Why this score
SourceCrossContact UHPGeolandar G91F
Tyre Reviews owners 74 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryContinental CrossContact UHPYokohama Geolandar G91F
Relative Score 71 70
Dry 86 78
Wet 79 65
Snow – 43
Comfort 72 73
Noise – 72
Treadwear 53 64
Handling 74 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact UHP

The Continental Cross Contact UHP is a polarizing tire that delivers strong dry and wet road performance but suffers from significant inconsistency regarding tread longevity. While many users praise its handling, stability, and confidence-inspiring grip, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature and uneven wear, particularly on heavier SUVs and 4x4 vehicles.

Pros

  • Strong dry and wet road grip
  • Predictable handling and cornering stability
  • Good performance in light snow and varied weather conditions
  • Quiet operation on many vehicle platforms

Cons

  • Extremely inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • High road noise reported by a significant subset of users
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality
  • Poor off-road capability, particularly on wet grass or mud

Observations

  • Heavy SUVs and 4x4s frequently exhibit rapid front-axle tire wear, often requiring rotation as early as 8,000-10,000 miles to maintain even tread depth.
  • Users with high-center-of-gravity vehicles report that aggressive cornering significantly accelerates rear tire scrubbing.
  • Performance varies notably by vehicle weight; lighter or more balanced setups report significantly higher mileage than heavy luxury SUVs.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G91F

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact UHP B · Yokohama Geolandar G91F
Sizes available9—
Rim diameters18″ – 21″—
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Too close to call: Continental CrossContact UHP and Yokohama Geolandar G91F are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact UHP is stronger on wet and dry. Yokohama Geolandar G91F is stronger on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact UHP scores 79 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar G91F scores 64 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact UHP scores 86 vs 78 on dry.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact UHP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91F
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.