Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
24 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
83
Snow
50
Comfort
76
Noise
70
Treadwear
70
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
55/100
Owner ratings
Dry
85
Wet
77
Snow
70
Comfort
76
Noise
70
Treadwear
78
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A — better snow and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV if wet matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo2 SUV leads by 1
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
86
B — Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
85
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVGeolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners 81 78
Tyre Reviews owners 88 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo2 SUV leads by 6
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
83
B — Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
77
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVGeolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners 67 76
Tyre Reviews owners 86 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar H/T G95A leads by 20
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
50
B — Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
70
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVGeolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners – 85

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
76
B — Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
76
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVGeolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners 69 70
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
70
B — Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
70

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolandar H/T G95A leads by 8
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
70
B — Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
78
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVGeolandar H/T G95A
Tire Rack owners 29 75
Tyre Reviews owners 76 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar H/T G95A leads by 2
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
81
B — Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
83
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo2 SUVGeolandar H/T G95A
Tyre Reviews owners 81 –

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUVYokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
Relative Score 74 77
Dry 86 85
Wet 83 77
Snow 50 70
Comfort 76 76
Noise 70 70
Treadwear 70 78
Handling 81 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that delivers impressive grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions. While most users praise its comfort and cost-effectiveness compared to premium rivals, tread life experiences are polarized, ranging from exceptional longevity to premature wear depending on vehicle weight and driving style.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money compared to premium brands
  • Strong ride comfort and low road noise
  • Effective rim protection design

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, particularly on heavier vehicles
  • Poor performance in snow and icy conditions
  • Limited off-road capability
  • Reports of poor customer service and warranty support in failure cases

Observations

  • Heavy SUVs and high-performance vehicles (e.g., Porsche Cayenne, Range Rover) may experience significantly accelerated outer-edge wear.
  • Users on mid-sized SUVs like the Tiguan and Sportage report more balanced and durable tread life, often exceeding 25,000 miles.
  • The tire is frequently noted as a superior, more affordable alternative to factory-fitted Continental tires on premium European SUVs.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tires—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A — better snow and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A scores 70 vs 50 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A scores 78 vs 70 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 83 vs 77 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.