Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Yokohama Geolander A/T S — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich A/T KO2

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
64
Snow
92
Comfort
61
Treadwear
80
Handling
50

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolander A/T S

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Yokohama Geolander A/T S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
Owner ratings
Dry
81
Wet
80
Snow
80
Comfort
81
Treadwear
85
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolander A/T S — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A/T KO2 leads by 3
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
84
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T S
81
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander A/T S
Tyre Reviews owners 83 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolander A/T S leads by 16
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
64
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T S
80
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander A/T S
Tyre Reviews owners 60 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A/T KO2 leads by 12
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
92
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T S
80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolander A/T S leads by 20
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
61
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T S
81
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander A/T S
Tyre Reviews owners 57 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolander A/T S leads by 5
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
80
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T S
85
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander A/T S
Tyre Reviews owners 79 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolander A/T S leads by 33
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
50
B — Yokohama Geolander A/T S
83
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander A/T S
Tyre Reviews owners 50 –

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Yokohama Geolander A/T S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich A/T KO2Yokohama Geolander A/T S
Relative Score 72 82
Dry 84 81
Wet 64 80
Snow 92 80
Comfort 61 81
Treadwear 80 85
Handling 50 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich A/T KO2

The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
  • Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
  • Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
  • Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise during daily driving
  • Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
  • Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options

Observations

  • Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
  • The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
Tire B Yokohama Geolander A/T S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 B · Yokohama Geolander A/T S
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tiresAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Geolander A/T S — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolander A/T S scores 83 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Geolander A/T S scores 81 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolander A/T S scores 80 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 92 vs 80 on snow.

Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolander A/T S

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.