Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Winter Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
98/100
1 owner review
Dry
90
Wet
100
Snow
100
Comfort
100
Noise
–
Treadwear
100
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

Premium Touring Winter tire

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
88/100
Owner ratings
Dry
87
Wet
91
Snow
93
Comfort
83
Noise
79
Treadwear
88
Handling
87

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak W810 leads by 3
A — Bridgestone Blizzak W810
90
B — Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
87
Why this score
SourceBlizzak W810iceGUARD iG51v
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Blizzak W810 leads by 9
A — Bridgestone Blizzak W810
100
B — Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
91
Why this score
SourceBlizzak W810iceGUARD iG51v
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak W810 leads by 7
A — Bridgestone Blizzak W810
100
B — Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
93
Why this score
SourceBlizzak W810iceGUARD iG51v
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak W810 leads by 17
A — Bridgestone Blizzak W810
100
B — Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
83
Why this score
SourceBlizzak W810iceGUARD iG51v
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak W810
–
B — Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
79

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Blizzak W810 leads by 12
A — Bridgestone Blizzak W810
100
B — Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
88
Why this score
SourceBlizzak W810iceGUARD iG51v
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak W810 leads by 3
A — Bridgestone Blizzak W810
90
B — Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
87
Why this score
SourceBlizzak W810iceGUARD iG51v
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak W810Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Relative Score 97 88
Dry 90 87
Wet 100 91
Snow 100 93
Comfort 100 83
Noise – 79
Treadwear 100 88
Handling 90 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak W810

The Bridgestone Blizzak W810 is highly regarded by commercial van operators for its exceptional traction across challenging winter conditions, including mud, snow, and ice. Users report that the tire provides reliable feedback and impressive longevity, making it a dependable choice for high-mileage daily use.

Pros

  • Excellent grip in diverse winter conditions such as mud, snow, and ice
  • High durability and long tread life for commercial applications
  • Provides consistent and reliable driver feedback

Cons

  • Longevity is highly dependent on proper vehicle wheel alignment and maintenance

Observations

  • Specifically praised for performance in daily commercial van operations
Tire B Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak W810 B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tiresPremium Touring Winter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth—13/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Yokohama

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak W810 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 scores 100 vs 83 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 scores 100 vs 88 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 scores 100 vs 91 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak W810 scores 100 vs 93 on snow.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.