Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac xtreme S | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac xtreme S | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac xtreme S | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac xtreme S | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac xtreme S | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac xtreme S | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S | Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | – |
| Dry | 84 | – |
| Wet | 84 | – |
| Snow | 87 | – |
| Comfort | 86 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | – |
| Handling | 85 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in severe cold, snow, and ice conditions. While it provides impressive traction for powerful 4x4 and performance vehicles, some users report concerns regarding dry-road handling precision and occasional quality control issues.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability on snow and ice
- Strong performance for high-horsepower and 4x4 vehicles
- Reliable handling in freezing, winter-specific conditions
- Effective wet-weather performance
Cons
- Reported lack of precision during dry-road cornering
- Potential for manufacturing defects, such as rubber separation
- Performance gap compared to premium summer tires in warmer temperatures
Observations
- Owners of high-performance SUVs like the Audi SQ5 and Range Rover Evoque report high satisfaction with the tire's ability to handle heavy, powerful vehicles in alpine conditions.
- Users noted that the tire's performance characteristics are specifically optimized for near-freezing temperatures rather than mild or warm weather.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Vredestein
Yokohama
Only Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.