Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 vs Yokohama S306 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth RV02

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
62/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
77/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
34
Wet
84
Comfort
50
Treadwear
59
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama S306

Summer Touring tires

Yokohama S306 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
17 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
59
Comfort
64
Treadwear
74
Handling
62

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama S306 — better dry, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth RV02 if wet and handling matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S306 leads by 48
A — Yokohama BluEarth RV02
34
B — Yokohama S306
82
Why this score
SourceBluEarth RV02S306
Professional tests (TWG score) 1 –
Tyre Reviews owners 83 82

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) BluEarth RV02 leads by 25
A — Yokohama BluEarth RV02
84
B — Yokohama S306
59
Why this score
SourceBluEarth RV02S306
Professional tests (TWG score) 86 –
Tyre Reviews owners 81 59

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S306 leads by 14
A — Yokohama BluEarth RV02
50
B — Yokohama S306
64
Why this score
SourceBluEarth RV02S306
Professional tests (TWG score) 26 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 64

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) S306 leads by 15
A — Yokohama BluEarth RV02
59
B — Yokohama S306
74
Why this score
SourceBluEarth RV02S306
Tyre Reviews owners 59 74

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth RV02 leads by 18
A — Yokohama BluEarth RV02
80
B — Yokohama S306
62
Why this score
SourceBluEarth RV02S306
Tyre Reviews owners 80 62

Scores at a glance

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 vs Yokohama S306: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama BluEarth RV02Yokohama S306
Relative Score 64 68
Dry 34 82
Wet 84 59
Comfort 50 64
Treadwear 59 74
Handling 80 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama BluEarth RV02

The Yokohama BluEarth RV02 is widely regarded as a high-comfort, stable tire specifically engineered for MPVs and SUVs with higher centers of gravity. While users consistently praise its superior wet-weather grip and noise suppression, long-term satisfaction is somewhat tempered by reports of inconsistent tread longevity and potential material degradation over time.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
  • Competitive fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
  • Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds

Observations

  • Users specifically noted that the tire significantly improves stability and reduces body roll in MPVs like the Toyota Vellfire.
  • Drivers of SUVs, such as the Hyundai Tucson and Nissan Qashqai, reported a marked improvement in handling and wet-weather confidence compared to OEM tire options.
Tire B Yokohama S306

The Yokohama S306 is a polarizing tire that excels in dry conditions and longevity but receives significant criticism for its poor wet-weather performance. While some users appreciate its durability and value, many report a lack of confidence and traction when driving on damp or rainy surfaces.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and handling
  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback
  • Cost-effective price point

Cons

  • Consistently poor wet weather traction
  • Harsh ride quality and high road noise
  • Tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces
  • Unstable at higher speeds on certain performance vehicles

Observations

  • Performance-oriented vehicles like the VW R32 and Mazda3 report significant dissatisfaction with wet grip and ride comfort.
  • Users with heavier, steady-driving vehicles like the Ford Mondeo report higher satisfaction levels, suggesting the tire may be better suited for touring than spirited driving.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 B · Yokohama S306
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama S306 — better dry, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth RV02 if wet and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama S306 scores 82 vs 34 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 84 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 80 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama S306 scores 74 vs 59 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Tire B · Yokohama S306

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.