Bridgestone B 390 review
The Bridgestone B 390 is generally regarded as a competent, albeit aging, all-rounder that often serves as an original equipment choice for various passenger vehicles. While users appreciate its dry-weather performance and longevity in specific low-usage scenarios, the tire is frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and a tendency to wander at highway speeds.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
67%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 10 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The Bridgestone B 390 is generally regarded as a competent, albeit aging, all-rounder that often serves as an original equipment choice for various passenger vehicles. While users appreciate its dry-weather performance and longevity in specific low-usage scenarios, the tire is frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and a tendency to wander at highway speeds.
Pros
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Solid performance as an original equipment factory fitment
- Good durability when used in low-mileage or climate-controlled conditions
- Satisfactory all-around performance for daily commuting
Cons
- Short tread life reported by many users
- Noticeable road noise, particularly from the rear axle
- Tendency for the vehicle to wander or track poorly at highway speeds
- Stiff ride quality on uneven or damaged road surfaces
Worth knowing
- Users of commercial or utility-focused vehicles like the Ford Transit Connect reported disappointing tread longevity.
- Drivers of mid-sized sedans like the Skoda Octavia noted a consistent issue with vehicle wandering at highway speeds.
- The tire demonstrates high durability in tropical, low-mileage environments, as evidenced by long-term performance on a Toyota Innova.