Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Avon ZZ5 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 86 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 82 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 65 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 79 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 74 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 77 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 80 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon ZZ5 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 80 |
| Dry | 90 | 86 |
| Wet | 83 | 83 |
| Comfort | 82 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 74 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 77 |
| Handling | 86 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon ZZ5 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in terms of ride comfort, noise reduction, and dry-weather grip. While many users praise its handling and wet-weather confidence, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity, with some drivers experiencing rapid wear, particularly on high-torque or front-wheel-drive vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip performance
- High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
- Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort
- Progressive handling and predictable feedback at the limit
- Effective rim protection design
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Poor performance in snow or icy conditions
- Occasional reports of increased noise or 'droning' as the tire wears
- Some users report a 'bedding-in' period where initial handling feels vague or twitchy
Observations
- Users with high-torque, front-wheel-drive vehicles frequently report faster front-tire wear compared to rear-wheel-drive setups.
- Owners of vehicles with firm, sporty suspension (e.g., Mazda MX-5, VW GTI) report the tire complements the car's handling characteristics well.
- Drivers of heavy, high-powered diesel sedans noted that while the tire improves comfort, the weight of the vehicle can accelerate tread depletion.
The Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry grip, often outperforming more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its quietness and comfort, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding high rolling resistance and inconsistent experiences with road noise and ride firmness.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors.
- Generally low road noise and high levels of ride comfort.
- Strong, durable sidewalls that provide positive handling feedback.
Cons
- Increased fuel consumption reported by many users due to high rolling resistance.
- Inconsistent reports on noise levels, with some users finding them louder than expected.
- Ride quality can feel overly firm or 'harsh' on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Some reports of premature wear or rapid tread depth reduction in specific driving conditions.
Observations
- Drivers of lightweight, sporty hatchbacks (e.g., Mini Cooper, Renault Twingo RS) report significant handling improvements and a more 'planted' feel compared to OEM run-flat or budget tires.
- Users with firm or sport-tuned suspensions occasionally find the tire's sidewall stiffness makes the ride feel too harsh on imperfect road surfaces.
- Performance on heavy or high-torque vehicles can lead to faster tread wear if driven aggressively.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Avon ZZ5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Based on 5 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon ZZ5 | B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon
Falken
Too close to call: Avon ZZ5 and Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun are within 2 points overall. Avon ZZ5 is stronger on comfort, handling and dry. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is stronger on treadwear.
Avon ZZ5 scores 82 vs 71 on comfort.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 77 vs 70 on treadwear.
Avon ZZ5 scores 86 vs 80 on handling.
Avon ZZ5 scores 90 vs 86 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.