Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Avon ZZ5 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 87 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 81 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 77 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 73 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ZZ5 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 79 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon ZZ5 | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 83 |
| Dry | 90 | 91 |
| Wet | 83 | 85 |
| Snow | – | 67 |
| Comfort | 82 | 84 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 78 |
| Handling | 86 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon ZZ5 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in terms of ride comfort, noise reduction, and dry-weather grip. While many users praise its handling and wet-weather confidence, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity, with some drivers experiencing rapid wear, particularly on high-torque or front-wheel-drive vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip performance
- High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
- Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort
- Progressive handling and predictable feedback at the limit
- Effective rim protection design
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Poor performance in snow or icy conditions
- Occasional reports of increased noise or 'droning' as the tire wears
- Some users report a 'bedding-in' period where initial handling feels vague or twitchy
Observations
- Users with high-torque, front-wheel-drive vehicles frequently report faster front-tire wear compared to rear-wheel-drive setups.
- Owners of vehicles with firm, sporty suspension (e.g., Mazda MX-5, VW GTI) report the tire complements the car's handling characteristics well.
- Drivers of heavy, high-powered diesel sedans noted that while the tire improves comfort, the weight of the vehicle can accelerate tread depletion.
The Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, wet weather confidence, and comfort at a competitive price point. While it excels in daily driving and spirited road use, some enthusiasts note limitations in steering precision and sidewall stiffness when pushed to the absolute limit on track or in aggressive cornering.
Pros
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier brands.
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet road conditions.
- Low road noise levels and high comfort for a performance tire.
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'floaty' feel or lack of steering feedback during aggressive maneuvers.
- Tread life is generally considered average to short, particularly for spirited drivers.
- Performance can degrade noticeably as the tire wears down, specifically regarding noise and wet grip.
- Not suitable for cold weather or near-freezing temperatures.
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Mustang GT, C5/C6 Corvette) report excellent straight-line hook but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates rear tread wear.
- Drivers of European sedans (BMW, Audi) appreciate the comfort and noise reduction compared to OEM run-flat tires, though some note the soft sidewall is less ideal for track-focused setups.
- Some users on 17-inch or smaller wheels report a firmer ride than expected, while those on larger diameters generally praise the balance of comfort and performance.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon ZZ5 | B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better treadwear. Pick the Avon ZZ5 if handling matters most to you.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 78 vs 70 on treadwear.
Avon ZZ5 scores 86 vs 79 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.