Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Avon ZZ5 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Avon

Avon ZZ5

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Avon ZZ5 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
93 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
83
Snow
–
Comfort
82
Noise
–
Treadwear
70
Handling
86

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Hankook

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
152 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
85
Snow
67
Comfort
84
Noise
92
Treadwear
78
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better treadwear. Pick the Avon ZZ5 if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 1
A — Avon ZZ5
90
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
91
Why this score
SourceZZ5Ventus V12 evo2
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners 90 87

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 2
A — Avon ZZ5
83
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
85
Why this score
SourceZZ5Ventus V12 evo2
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners 83 81

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Avon ZZ5
–
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
67

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 2
A — Avon ZZ5
82
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
84
Why this score
SourceZZ5Ventus V12 evo2
Tire Rack owners – 82
Tyre Reviews owners 82 77

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Avon ZZ5
–
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
92

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 8
A — Avon ZZ5
70
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
78
Why this score
SourceZZ5Ventus V12 evo2
Tire Rack owners – 72
Tyre Reviews owners 70 73

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZZ5 leads by 7
A — Avon ZZ5
86
B — Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
79
Why this score
SourceZZ5Ventus V12 evo2
Tyre Reviews owners 86 79

Scores at a glance

Avon ZZ5 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryAvon ZZ5Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Relative Score 81 83
Dry 90 91
Wet 83 85
Snow – 67
Comfort 82 84
Noise – 92
Treadwear 70 78
Handling 86 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Avon ZZ5

The Avon ZZ5 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in terms of ride comfort, noise reduction, and dry-weather grip. While many users praise its handling and wet-weather confidence, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity, with some drivers experiencing rapid wear, particularly on high-torque or front-wheel-drive vehicles.

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip performance
  • High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
  • Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort
  • Progressive handling and predictable feedback at the limit
  • Effective rim protection design

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Poor performance in snow or icy conditions
  • Occasional reports of increased noise or 'droning' as the tire wears
  • Some users report a 'bedding-in' period where initial handling feels vague or twitchy

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, front-wheel-drive vehicles frequently report faster front-tire wear compared to rear-wheel-drive setups.
  • Owners of vehicles with firm, sporty suspension (e.g., Mazda MX-5, VW GTI) report the tire complements the car's handling characteristics well.
  • Drivers of heavy, high-powered diesel sedans noted that while the tire improves comfort, the weight of the vehicle can accelerate tread depletion.
Tire B Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

The Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, wet weather confidence, and comfort at a competitive price point. While it excels in daily driving and spirited road use, some enthusiasts note limitations in steering precision and sidewall stiffness when pushed to the absolute limit on track or in aggressive cornering.

Pros

  • Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier brands.
  • Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet road conditions.
  • Low road noise levels and high comfort for a performance tire.
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'floaty' feel or lack of steering feedback during aggressive maneuvers.
  • Tread life is generally considered average to short, particularly for spirited drivers.
  • Performance can degrade noticeably as the tire wears down, specifically regarding noise and wet grip.
  • Not suitable for cold weather or near-freezing temperatures.

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Mustang GT, C5/C6 Corvette) report excellent straight-line hook but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates rear tread wear.
  • Drivers of European sedans (BMW, Audi) appreciate the comfort and noise reduction compared to OEM run-flat tires, though some note the soft sidewall is less ideal for track-focused setups.
  • Some users on 17-inch or smaller wheels report a firmer ride than expected, while those on larger diameters generally praise the balance of comfort and performance.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Avon ZZ5 B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Avon

Hankook

Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better treadwear. Pick the Avon ZZ5 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 78 vs 70 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Avon ZZ5 scores 86 vs 79 on handling.

Tire A · Avon ZZ5
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.