Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Avon ZZR vs Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Avon

Avon ZZR

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Avon ZZR tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
11 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
61
Comfort
70
Treadwear
70
Handling
86

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
10 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
74
Comfort
62
Treadwear
74
Handling
84

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Avon ZZR if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta XS KU36 leads by 2
A — Avon ZZR
89
B — Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
91
Why this score
SourceZZREcsta XS KU36
Tyre Reviews owners 89 91

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta XS KU36 leads by 13
A — Avon ZZR
61
B — Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
74
Why this score
SourceZZREcsta XS KU36
Tyre Reviews owners 61 74

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZZR leads by 8
A — Avon ZZR
70
B — Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
62
Why this score
SourceZZREcsta XS KU36
Tyre Reviews owners 70 62

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta XS KU36 leads by 4
A — Avon ZZR
70
B — Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
74
Why this score
SourceZZREcsta XS KU36
Tyre Reviews owners 70 74

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZZR leads by 2
A — Avon ZZR
86
B — Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
84
Why this score
SourceZZREcsta XS KU36
Tyre Reviews owners 86 84

Scores at a glance

Avon ZZR vs Kumho Ecsta XS KU36: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryAvon ZZRKumho Ecsta XS KU36
Relative Score 73 76
Dry 89 91
Wet 61 74
Comfort 70 62
Treadwear 70 74
Handling 86 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Avon ZZR

The Avon ZZR is a specialized track-focused tire that delivers exceptional dry-weather grip and performance, particularly for lightweight sports cars like the Caterham and Lotus Elise. While highly regarded for track use, users consistently warn that its wet-weather capabilities are severely limited, making it unsuitable for year-round road driving or inclement conditions.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and traction
  • Strong performance consistency during consecutive track laps
  • Lightweight construction ideal for track-oriented vehicles
  • Good longevity and wear characteristics when used appropriately

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance and high risk of aquaplaning
  • Sensitive to low temperatures
  • Thin sidewalls provide minimal rim protection
  • Prone to flat-spotting if left stationary for extended periods

Observations

  • Highly praised by owners of lightweight, track-focused vehicles like the Caterham 7 and Lotus Exige.
  • Users noted that tire pressure management is critical for optimal performance, with some reporting significant handling improvements at higher PSI settings.
  • Performance on heavier road cars is mixed, with reports of uneven wear and less predictable breakaway characteristics compared to dedicated track platforms.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta XS KU36

The Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, performance-oriented tire that excels in dry grip and track-day environments. While users appreciate its aggressive handling and value proposition, the consensus highlights significant drawbacks regarding road noise and steering feedback, making it better suited for dedicated weekend or track vehicles rather than daily commuters.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry surface grip and cornering confidence
  • Strong, rigid sidewall construction
  • High value-to-performance ratio
  • Surprisingly capable performance in wet conditions for a semi-slick design

Cons

  • High levels of road noise that tend to worsen over time
  • Lack of steering precision and on-center feel
  • Rapid tread wear consistent with aggressive performance compounds
  • Limited stability in heavy rain or at high speeds on wet surfaces

Observations

  • Users running staggered setups (e.g., 245/40/18 front and 275/35/18 rear) report positive experiences with dry grip and cornering.
  • Drivers with already loud or modified vehicles tend to be less bothered by the tire's significant road noise compared to those in stock, quieter vehicles.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Avon ZZR B · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Avon

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Avon ZZR if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 74 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Avon ZZR scores 70 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 74 vs 70 on treadwear.

Tire A · Avon ZZR
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.