76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 vs Michelin Power SuperSport Evo — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
93/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Power SuperSport Evo — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta XS KU36 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta XS KU36 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta XS KU36 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta XS KU36 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta XS KU36 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 95 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 | Michelin Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 88 |
| Dry | 91 | 100 |
| Wet | 74 | 80 |
| Comfort | 62 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 80 |
| Handling | 84 | 95 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, performance-oriented tire that excels in dry grip and track-day environments. While users appreciate its aggressive handling and value proposition, the consensus highlights significant drawbacks regarding road noise and steering feedback, making it better suited for dedicated weekend or track vehicles rather than daily commuters.
Pros
- Exceptional dry surface grip and cornering confidence
- Strong, rigid sidewall construction
- High value-to-performance ratio
- Surprisingly capable performance in wet conditions for a semi-slick design
Cons
- High levels of road noise that tend to worsen over time
- Lack of steering precision and on-center feel
- Rapid tread wear consistent with aggressive performance compounds
- Limited stability in heavy rain or at high speeds on wet surfaces
Observations
- Users running staggered setups (e.g., 245/40/18 front and 275/35/18 rear) report positive experiences with dry grip and cornering.
- Drivers with already loud or modified vehicles tend to be less bothered by the tire's significant road noise compared to those in stock, quieter vehicles.
The Michelin Power SuperSport Evo is highly regarded by riders for its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up times, and precise handling characteristics. Users consistently report increased confidence during aggressive cornering and canyon riding compared to competing sport-oriented tires.
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Rapid warm-up time for immediate performance
- High levels of rider feedback and steering precision
- Superior bump absorption compared to direct competitors
Cons
- Limited data available regarding long-term tread longevity
- Insufficient user feedback on wet weather performance
Observations
- Riders of sportbikes, such as the Suzuki GSXR, report significant performance improvements over previous-generation tires like the Pilot Power 2CT.
- The tire is specifically noted as an ideal upgrade for weekend canyon riding and spirited road use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 | B · Michelin Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Kumho
88
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Power SuperSport Evo — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo scores 100 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo scores 95 vs 84 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo scores 100 vs 91 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo scores 80 vs 74 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
Tire B · Michelin Power SuperSport Evo
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 also compared with
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.