–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 84 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 89 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 84 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 86 |
| Dry | – | 85 |
| Wet | – | 89 |
| Snow | – | 99 |
| Comfort | – | 84 |
| Treadwear | – | 86 |
| Handling | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Tire A
86
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT is highly regarded for its exceptional winter performance, particularly in transforming the drivability of rear-wheel-drive vehicles in snow and ice. While users praise its confidence-inspiring grip and comfort, they note that its performance diminishes significantly in warmer, dry conditions, where braking distances increase and handling becomes less precise.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and control on snow and ice
- Significant improvement in winter mobility for rear-wheel-drive vehicles
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality compared to standard summer run-flats
- Effective slush dispersal
Cons
- Reduced braking performance and handling in temperatures above 20°C
- Longer braking distances on dry pavement compared to summer tires
- Performance limitations when used outside of cold-weather conditions
Observations
- Owners of rear-wheel-drive BMW models (3 Series, Z4) report a transformative improvement in winter capability.
- Downsizing to 16-inch wheels from larger summer setups is noted as a successful strategy for maximizing winter grip.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 660 - 740 B A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 50 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
BFGoodrich
86
/ 100
Bridgestone
Only Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.