67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Michelin HydroEdge — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin HydroEdge — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | HydroEdge |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
HydroEdge leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | HydroEdge |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 85 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | HydroEdge |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
HydroEdge leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | HydroEdge |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 60 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | HydroEdge |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
HydroEdge leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | HydroEdge |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Michelin HydroEdge |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 74 |
| Dry | 80 | 80 |
| Wet | 67 | 85 |
| Snow | 20 | – |
| Comfort | 50 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 75 |
| Handling | 57 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
74
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Michelin HydroEdge receives a mixed reception from users, with opinions polarized between its wet and winter weather capabilities and its refinement levels. While some drivers praise its reliable traction in adverse conditions, others report significant dissatisfaction regarding cabin noise and ride comfort.
Pros
- Strong traction and grip on wet road surfaces
- Commendable performance in light snow conditions
- Reliable handling characteristics
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Lack of ride comfort
- Premium price point compared to competitors
Observations
- Users operating larger vehicles, such as the Chevy Uplander van, report high satisfaction with the tire's grip in inclement weather.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Michelin HydroEdge |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
BFGoodrich
74
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin HydroEdge — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin HydroEdge scores 85 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin HydroEdge scores 60 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin HydroEdge scores 60 vs 57 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Michelin HydroEdge
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.