Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Bridgestone Potenza RE92A — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
84
Snow
69
Comfort
87
Treadwear
81
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Bridgestone

Bridgestone Potenza RE92A

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Bridgestone Potenza RE92A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
53/100
1 owner review
Dry
80
Wet
60
Snow
–
Comfort
20
Treadwear
60
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 10
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
90
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
80
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE92A
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 100 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 24
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
84
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
60
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE92A
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 60

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
69
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 67
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
87
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
20
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE92A
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 20

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 21
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
81
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
60
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE92A
Tyre Reviews owners 50 60

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 20
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
90
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
70
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE92A
Tyre Reviews owners 90 70

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Bridgestone Potenza RE92A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SBridgestone Potenza RE92A
Relative Score 86 58
Dry 90 80
Wet 84 60
Snow 69 –
Comfort 87 20
Treadwear 81 60
Handling 90 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
  • Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
  • Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
  • Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
  • Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
  • Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
Tire B Bridgestone Potenza RE92A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 AA A—
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Bridgestone

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 87 vs 20 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 84 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 81 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 70 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE92A

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.