Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
84
Snow
69
Comfort
87
Treadwear
81
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S and Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S is stronger on dry and handling. Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 is stronger on wet and treadwear.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 7
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
90
B — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
83
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SExtremeContact DWS 06
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 76
Tyre Reviews owners 100 93
Dry Braking (% of best) 96% 97%
Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 99%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 7
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
84
B — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
91
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SExtremeContact DWS 06
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 91
Tyre Reviews owners 80 90
Wet Braking (% of best) 89% 98%
Wet Handling (% of best) 98% 95%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 2
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
69
B — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
67
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SExtremeContact DWS 06
Professional tests (TWG score) – 62
Tyre Reviews owners – 77

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 2
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
87
B — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
89
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SExtremeContact DWS 06
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 89
Tyre Reviews owners 90 66

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads by 4
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
81
B — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
85
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SExtremeContact DWS 06
Tyre Reviews owners 50 68

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 6
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
90
B — Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
84
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SExtremeContact DWS 06
Tyre Reviews owners 90 84

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Relative Score 83 84
Dry 90 83
Wet 84 91
Snow 69 67
Comfort 87 89
Treadwear 81 85
Handling 90 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 96% #5/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test 97% #4/7 · 2020 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test -1.1 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #4/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test 99% #5/7 · 2020 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test -0.2 Different tests
Price Other 94% #5/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test 95% #4/7 · 2020 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test -0.8 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 17% #6/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test 20% #5/7 · 2020 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test -3.3 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 95% #6/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test 95% #2/7 · 2020 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Subj. Noise Subj 98% #4/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test 85% #3/7 · 2020 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test +13 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 89% #7/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test 98% #5/7 · 2020 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test -8.7 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #5/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test 95% #1/7 · 2020 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test +3.2 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
  • Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
  • Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
  • Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
  • Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
  • Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
Tire B Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″10/32″
UTQG400 AA A560 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Continental

Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S and Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S is stronger on dry and handling. Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 is stronger on wet and treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 83 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 91 vs 84 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 84 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 85 vs 81 on treadwear.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.