Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Cooper Zeon RS3-A — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
84
Snow
69
Comfort
87
Noise
–
Treadwear
81
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Cooper

Cooper Zeon RS3-A

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

Cooper Zeon RS3-A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
69 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
84
Snow
71
Comfort
87
Noise
82
Treadwear
69
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Zeon RS3-A leads by 1
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
90
B — Cooper Zeon RS3-A
91
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZeon RS3-A
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 100 97

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
84
B — Cooper Zeon RS3-A
84
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZeon RS3-A
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 93

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Zeon RS3-A leads by 2
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
69
B — Cooper Zeon RS3-A
71

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
87
B — Cooper Zeon RS3-A
87
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZeon RS3-A
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
–
B — Cooper Zeon RS3-A
82

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 12
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
81
B — Cooper Zeon RS3-A
69
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZeon RS3-A
Tyre Reviews owners 50 93

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Zeon RS3-A leads by 2
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
90
B — Cooper Zeon RS3-A
92
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SZeon RS3-A
Tyre Reviews owners 90 90

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Cooper Zeon RS3-A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SCooper Zeon RS3-A
Relative Score 83 81
Dry 90 91
Wet 84 84
Snow 69 71
Comfort 87 87
Noise – 82
Treadwear 81 69
Handling 90 92

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
  • Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
  • Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
  • Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
  • Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
  • Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
Tire B Cooper Zeon RS3-A

The Cooper Zeon RS3-A is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that excels in dry and wet handling, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While many users praise its aggressive aesthetics and responsive cornering, the consensus is heavily polarized by concerns regarding rapid tread wear and increased road noise as the tires age.

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet weather traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Responsive handling and directional stability
  • Aggressive, attractive tread design

Cons

  • Short tread life and rapid wear
  • Increased road noise as the tire wears
  • Inconsistent launch traction on high-horsepower vehicles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to potential flex during aggressive cornering

Observations

  • High-horsepower vehicles (e.g., Mustang, Challenger, Camaro) frequently report difficulty with launch traction and accelerated rear-tire wear.
  • Users noted that the tire's pronounced sidewall can cause fender rubbing on vehicles with tighter wheel well clearances, such as the Ford C-Max.
  • Performance sedan owners generally report higher satisfaction with ride comfort compared to dedicated track-focused tires.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Cooper Zeon RS3-A
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireUltra High Performance All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 AA A—
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Cooper

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 81 vs 69 on treadwear.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Cooper Zeon RS3-A

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.