83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Goodyear Eagle RS-A — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
75 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S and Goodyear Eagle RS-A are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S is stronger on handling. Goodyear Eagle RS-A is stronger on snow, treadwear and dry.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eagle RS-A leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 96 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle RS-A leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Eagle RS-A leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 55 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 35 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle RS-A leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 52 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle RS-A leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 67 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 63 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Goodyear Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 84 |
| Dry | 90 | 94 |
| Wet | 84 | 88 |
| Snow | 69 | 76 |
| Comfort | 87 | 90 |
| Noise | – | 90 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 87 |
| Handling | 90 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
- Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
- Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
- Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
- Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
- Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
The Goodyear Eagle RS-A is widely regarded as a dependable, value-oriented all-season tire that excels in dry conditions and offers competitive longevity for daily commuting. While many users praise its consistent performance and affordability, a segment of the driving community reports concerns regarding wet-weather traction and noise levels as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry road handling and cornering grip
- Reliable tread life for many users, often reaching 60,000 miles
- Consistent availability as an OEM replacement tire
Cons
- Inconsistent traction in heavy rain or standing water
- Poor performance in deep snow and ice conditions
- Increased road noise reported after significant mileage
- Hard rubber compound can lead to a vague steering feel for performance-oriented drivers
Observations
- Users with mid-size sedans like the Ford Fusion and Nissan Maxima frequently report achieving the advertised 60,000-mile tread life.
- Drivers of lighter vehicles, such as the Mini Cooper, noted that the tire provides sufficient grip for daily driving but lacks the precision required for aggressive cornering.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Goodyear Eagle RS-A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | High Performance All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 14 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | 260 - 340 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
BFGoodrich
84
/ 100
Goodyear
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S and Goodyear Eagle RS-A are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S is stronger on handling. Goodyear Eagle RS-A is stronger on snow, treadwear and dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Goodyear Eagle RS-A scores 76 vs 69 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle RS-A scores 87 vs 81 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Eagle RS-A scores 94 vs 90 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle RS-A
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.