83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP72 if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
WinterCraft WP72 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 86 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 79 |
| Dry | 90 | 82 |
| Wet | 84 | 78 |
| Snow | 69 | 86 |
| Comfort | 87 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 80 |
| Handling | 90 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
- Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
- Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
- Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
- Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
- Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
The Kumho WinterCraft WP72 is widely regarded as a high-value performance winter tire that balances dry and wet road handling with competent snow traction. While most users praise its comfort, low noise levels, and affordability compared to premium alternatives, some report concerns regarding high-speed stability and potential issues with tire uniformity.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium winter tire brands
- Impressive noise suppression and ride comfort
- Strong performance on dry and wet surfaces
- Reliable traction in typical winter snow and slush conditions
Cons
- Vague handling and stability at higher highway speeds
- Reports of soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' feel
- Potential for flat-spotting and balancing issues
- Diminishing snow grip as the tread wears down
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and RWD vehicles report good snow traction, though some note minor slippage during aggressive cornering on wet surfaces.
- Performance-oriented vehicles like the Subaru BRZ and Tesla Model 3 find the tire to be a capable, budget-friendly alternative to extreme winter tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
BFGoodrich
79
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP72 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 86 vs 69 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 87 vs 77 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 82 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Kumho WinterCraft WP72
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S also compared with
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.