84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Continental ExtremeContact Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better snow, comfort and treadwear. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 92 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 85 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 18
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force Sport COMP-2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Continental ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 88 |
| Dry | 93 | 95 |
| Wet | 89 | 90 |
| Snow | 69 | 87 |
| Comfort | 83 | 91 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 87 |
| Handling | 90 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Sport Comp-2 is widely regarded as a high-performance, budget-friendly tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users praise its cornering stability and steering responsiveness, the consensus notes significant trade-offs regarding road noise and tread longevity. It is frequently cited as a 'driver's tire' that provides excellent value for those prioritizing handling over a quiet, long-lasting ride.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High level of steering responsiveness and cornering stability
- Excellent value for the price point
- Aggressive, sporty aesthetic
Cons
- Noticeable and sometimes intrusive road noise
- Faster-than-average tread wear
- Tendency to become louder as the tread wears down
- Occasional difficulty with balancing and vibration issues
Observations
- Users with heavy or high-horsepower vehicles (e.g., Chargers, Mustangs) report excellent grip but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates tread wear.
- Owners of luxury or touring-focused vehicles often report that the tire's noise levels are more apparent compared to OEM touring tires.
- Drivers of smaller, lightweight cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the steering precision, though some note the stiffer sidewalls can feel harsh on rough roads.
The Continental ExtremeContact Sport is widely regarded as a premier ultra-high-performance summer tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with aggressive handling capabilities. Users consistently praise its superior wet and dry grip, low noise levels, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors, though some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can slightly compromise steering precision.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Excellent value-to-performance ratio
- Strong performance even as tread wears down
Cons
- Softer sidewall can lead to a slight delay in steering response
- Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose performance during sustained high-heat track sessions
- Poor performance in cold temperatures (below 50°F)
- Potential for flat-spotting if left stationary in cold weather
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent synergy with the tire's handling characteristics, though some BRZ owners found the sidewall too soft for their specific suspension geometry.
- Drivers transitioning from factory run-flat tires on vehicles like the BMW Z4 noted a transformative improvement in ride quality and stability.
- EV owners noted that the tire handles the high torque and weight of electric vehicles well, though they remain mindful of accelerated tread wear under enthusiastic driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | B · Continental ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | 340 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
BFGoodrich
88
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better snow, comfort and treadwear. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 87 vs 69 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 90 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 91 vs 83 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 87 vs 81 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 also compared with
Continental ExtremeContact Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.