86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
47 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone A001 vs Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
90/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Bridgestone A001 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiRoadAttack 3 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | A001 | ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiRoadAttack 3 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | A001 | ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 100 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | A001 | ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 37 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | A001 | ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | A001 | ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiRoadAttack 3 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | A001 | ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 100 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone A001 | Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 89 |
| Dry | 91 | 100 |
| Wet | 92 | 100 |
| Snow | 37 | – |
| Comfort | 83 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 70 |
| Handling | 80 | 100 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone A001 is widely regarded by users as a highly capable all-season tire that excels in wet, cold, and wintry conditions without sacrificing significant performance in dry weather. While a small minority of users reported handling concerns, the vast majority of owners praise the tire for providing year-round confidence, impressive longevity, and a transformative improvement over standard summer tires in adverse climates.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
- Strong performance in cold temperatures, snow, and slush
- Impressive tread life and durability compared to standard summer tires
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Convenience of a single-tire solution for all seasons
Cons
- Increased road noise, particularly as the tire wears
- Minor reduction in fuel efficiency (approx. 1-4%)
- Occasional reports of vague handling or instability under specific emergency braking conditions
- Directional tread pattern limits tire rotation options
Observations
- Owners of rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., BMW M140) reported significant improvements in winter drivability and traction.
- Drivers of family estates and MPVs (e.g., Skoda Octavia, VW Touran) frequently noted the tire's ability to handle heavy loads while maintaining safety in poor weather.
- Some users noted that the tire's sidewall feel can be adjusted by slightly increasing tire pressure above factory recommendations to improve steering response.
The Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 is highly regarded as an exceptional performer for tarmac-focused riding, offering confidence-inspiring grip and handling. Users emphasize that it is strictly a road-oriented tire and performs poorly when subjected to off-road or gravel conditions.
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
- High level of rider confidence
- Well-suited for sport-touring applications
Cons
- Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
- Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
Observations
- Performance is optimized specifically for tarmac use, with users noting significant durability issues when taken off-road.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone A001 | B · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Bridgestone
89
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Bridgestone A001 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 100 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone A001 scores 84 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 100 vs 91 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 100 vs 92 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone A001
Tire B · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone A001 also compared with
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.