86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
47 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone A001 vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone A001 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | A001 | Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | A001 | Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 75 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | A001 | Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 37 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | A001 | Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | A001 | Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | A001 | Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 63 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone A001 | Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 75 |
| Dry | 91 | 77 |
| Wet | 92 | 75 |
| Snow | 37 | – |
| Comfort | 83 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 80 |
| Handling | 80 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone A001 is widely regarded by users as a highly capable all-season tire that excels in wet, cold, and wintry conditions without sacrificing significant performance in dry weather. While a small minority of users reported handling concerns, the vast majority of owners praise the tire for providing year-round confidence, impressive longevity, and a transformative improvement over standard summer tires in adverse climates.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
- Strong performance in cold temperatures, snow, and slush
- Impressive tread life and durability compared to standard summer tires
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Convenience of a single-tire solution for all seasons
Cons
- Increased road noise, particularly as the tire wears
- Minor reduction in fuel efficiency (approx. 1-4%)
- Occasional reports of vague handling or instability under specific emergency braking conditions
- Directional tread pattern limits tire rotation options
Observations
- Owners of rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., BMW M140) reported significant improvements in winter drivability and traction.
- Drivers of family estates and MPVs (e.g., Skoda Octavia, VW Touran) frequently noted the tire's ability to handle heavy loads while maintaining safety in poor weather.
- Some users noted that the tire's sidewall feel can be adjusted by slightly increasing tire pressure above factory recommendations to improve steering response.
The Hankook Dynapro HP presents a polarized user experience, with some owners reporting exceptional longevity and high mileage, while others encounter significant durability issues. Performance is generally considered adequate for standard road use, though it struggles in specialized conditions such as towing or off-road traction.
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capability
- Consistent performance for standard motorway and daily commuting
- Reliable wear characteristics for many long-term users
Cons
- Poor traction on wet grass or loose surfaces
- Inconsistent performance when towing heavy loads
- Reports of premature, uneven wear and thermal degradation in specific instances
Observations
- Users report varying experiences with towing, with some finding the tire capable for long-distance caravan travel while others note a lack of grip.
- Significant disparity in tread life reports, ranging from high-mileage satisfaction to rapid, uneven wear within the first few thousand miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone A001 | B · Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Bridgestone
75
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Bridgestone A001 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone A001 scores 92 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone A001 scores 80 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone A001 scores 91 vs 77 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone A001 scores 83 vs 73 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone A001
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone A001 also compared with
Hankook Dynapro HP also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.