72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Bridgestone A001 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
47 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone A001 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 91 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 92 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
A/T KO2 leads by 55
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 37 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 83 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 84 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
A001 leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | A001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Bridgestone A001 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 80 |
| Dry | 84 | 91 |
| Wet | 64 | 92 |
| Snow | 92 | 37 |
| Comfort | 61 | 83 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 84 |
| Handling | 50 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
- Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during daily driving
- Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
- Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
- The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
The Bridgestone A001 is widely regarded by users as a highly capable all-season tire that excels in wet, cold, and wintry conditions without sacrificing significant performance in dry weather. While a small minority of users reported handling concerns, the vast majority of owners praise the tire for providing year-round confidence, impressive longevity, and a transformative improvement over standard summer tires in adverse climates.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
- Strong performance in cold temperatures, snow, and slush
- Impressive tread life and durability compared to standard summer tires
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Convenience of a single-tire solution for all seasons
Cons
- Increased road noise, particularly as the tire wears
- Minor reduction in fuel efficiency (approx. 1-4%)
- Occasional reports of vague handling or instability under specific emergency braking conditions
- Directional tread pattern limits tire rotation options
Observations
- Owners of rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., BMW M140) reported significant improvements in winter drivability and traction.
- Drivers of family estates and MPVs (e.g., Skoda Octavia, VW Touran) frequently noted the tire's ability to handle heavy loads while maintaining safety in poor weather.
- Some users noted that the tire's sidewall feel can be adjusted by slightly increasing tire pressure above factory recommendations to improve steering response.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Bridgestone A001 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
BFGoodrich
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone A001 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 92 vs 37 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone A001 scores 80 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone A001 scores 92 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone A001 scores 83 vs 61 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Bridgestone A001
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 also compared with
Bridgestone A001 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.