78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on dry and wet. Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 is stronger on comfort and treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Roadian H/TX RT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Roadian H/TX RT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Roadian H/TX RT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Roadian H/TX RT5 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Roadian H/TX RT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 95 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Roadian H/TX RT5 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Roadian H/TX RT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Roadian H/TX RT5 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Roadian H/TX RT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 79 |
| Dry | 88 | 80 |
| Wet | 83 | 80 |
| Snow | 81 | 80 |
| Comfort | 83 | 95 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 70 |
| Handling | 74 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Nexen Roadian H/TX RH5 is generally regarded as a capable OEM-fitted tire that offers strong initial performance in diverse conditions, including towing and off-road environments like sand. However, user consensus is polarized regarding its longevity and handling consistency, with several reports indicating a significant decline in performance and stability once the tread begins to wear.
Pros
- Strong initial traction in varied weather conditions including snow, slush, and ice
- Excellent performance for towing applications
- Impressive off-road capability, particularly in soft sand
- Quiet operation and good fuel efficiency when new
Cons
- Noticeable decline in grip and handling characteristics after 8,000-10,000 miles
- Increased susceptibility to oversteer and instability on wet surfaces as tread wears
- Harsh ride quality and unpredictable handling at higher tire pressures
- Rapid degradation of specialized siping, reducing all-weather effectiveness
Observations
- Users operating pickup trucks like the Toyota Hilux and Ssangyong Musso noted that the tire's handling characteristics are highly sensitive to inflation pressure.
- The tire is frequently cited as a standard OEM fitment, with users noting that its performance profile changes drastically once the initial tread depth is reduced.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
79
/ 100
Nexen
Too close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on dry and wet. Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 is stronger on comfort and treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 scores 95 vs 83 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 88 vs 80 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 scores 70 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 80 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.