76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone B 391 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, wet and dry. Pick the Bridgestone B 391 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | B 391 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 91 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | B 391 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | B 391 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
B 391 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | B 391 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 81 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | B 391 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone B 391 | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 85 |
| Dry | 80 | 91 |
| Wet | 70 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 65 | 88 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 82 |
| Handling | 75 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone B 391 is widely regarded as a reliable, balanced original equipment tire best suited for conservative, daily driving. While it offers commendable durability and consistent performance across various weather conditions, it is frequently criticized for its intrusive road noise as the tread wears.
Pros
- High durability and long tread life
- Consistent, predictable grip in diverse weather conditions
- Stable and balanced handling for relaxed driving styles
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Not suitable for performance or sporty driving
- Higher price point compared to competitors with similar performance metrics
Observations
- Owners of compact vehicles like the Ford Fiesta report the tire is well-suited for standard commuting and highway use.
- Drivers of smaller hatchbacks, such as the Fiat Punto, noted that road noise can become particularly intrusive depending on the vehicle's cabin insulation.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone B 391 | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Bridgestone
85
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, wet and dry. Pick the Bridgestone B 391 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 80 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 80 vs 75 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone B 391
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone B 391 also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.