Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone B380 RFT vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Bridgestone B380 RFT tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
Owner ratings
Dry
80
Wet
75
Snow
58
Comfort
66
Noise
62
Treadwear
55
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Laufenn

Laufenn G FIT AS

All Season Touring tires

Laufenn G FIT AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
20 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
72
Snow
67
Comfort
85
Noise
91
Treadwear
66
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Laufenn G FIT AS — better noise, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone B380 RFT if wet matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) G FIT AS leads by 6
A — Bridgestone B380 RFT
80
B — Laufenn G FIT AS
86
Why this score
SourceB380 RFTG FIT AS
Tire Rack owners – 88
Tyre Reviews owners – 81

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) B380 RFT leads by 3
A — Bridgestone B380 RFT
75
B — Laufenn G FIT AS
72
Why this score
SourceB380 RFTG FIT AS
Tire Rack owners – 78
Tyre Reviews owners – 65

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) G FIT AS leads by 9
A — Bridgestone B380 RFT
58
B — Laufenn G FIT AS
67
Why this score
SourceB380 RFTG FIT AS
Tire Rack owners – 67
Tyre Reviews owners – 54

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) G FIT AS leads by 19
A — Bridgestone B380 RFT
66
B — Laufenn G FIT AS
85
Why this score
SourceB380 RFTG FIT AS
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) G FIT AS leads by 29
A — Bridgestone B380 RFT
62
B — Laufenn G FIT AS
91

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) G FIT AS leads by 11
A — Bridgestone B380 RFT
55
B — Laufenn G FIT AS
66
Why this score
SourceB380 RFTG FIT AS
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners – 61

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) B380 RFT leads by 1
A — Bridgestone B380 RFT
78
B — Laufenn G FIT AS
77
Why this score
SourceB380 RFTG FIT AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 77

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone B380 RFT vs Laufenn G FIT AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone B380 RFTLaufenn G FIT AS
Relative Score 67 76
Dry 80 86
Wet 75 72
Snow 58 67
Comfort 66 85
Noise 62 91
Treadwear 55 66
Handling 78 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone B380 RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Laufenn G FIT AS

The Laufenn G Fit AS is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, entry-level tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction for daily commuting. While many users appreciate the value proposition, there is a significant divide regarding wet-weather performance and long-term tread longevity, with some users reporting premature wear and poor traction in rain.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Good dry weather handling
  • Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for some users

Cons

  • Poor traction and grip in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life failing to meet mileage expectations
  • Concerns regarding overall build quality and durability
  • Average handling characteristics

Observations

  • Users driving smaller, lower-powered vehicles reported significant wheel spin in wet conditions, suggesting limited grip for acceleration.
  • Repeat customers noted the tire performs reliably on a variety of mid-sized sedans and crossovers like the Toyota Venza, Camry, and Elantra, provided expectations are set for a budget tire.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone B380 RFT B · Laufenn G FIT AS
Category—All Season Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Laufenn

Winner: Laufenn G FIT AS — better noise, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone B380 RFT if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Laufenn G FIT AS scores 91 vs 62 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn G FIT AS scores 85 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn G FIT AS scores 66 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn G FIT AS scores 67 vs 58 on snow.

Tire A · Bridgestone B380 RFT
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.