Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD vs Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 94 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 98 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 99 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 58 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 86 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 86 |
| Dry | 100 | 90 |
| Wet | 60 | 90 |
| Snow | – | 99 |
| Comfort | 50 | 90 |
| Noise | – | 88 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 82 |
| Handling | 70 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD is highly regarded for its exceptional dry-weather performance and suitability for autocross applications. While users praise its grip and durability relative to its performance compound, it shows significant limitations in wet-weather conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and handling
- Strong performance in autocross environments
- Commendable tread life for a high-performance compound
Cons
- Poor performance in wet conditions
- Rapid tread wear when pushed to the limit
Observations
- Users report the tire remains effective for up to 10,000 miles before reaching significant wear levels.
- The compound is specifically noted as being well-suited for high-intensity driving scenarios like autocross.
The Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is widely regarded as a premier dedicated winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and braking performance on snow and ice. While users acknowledge that the soft rubber compound leads to faster tread wear if used in warmer temperatures, the consensus is that the safety and handling benefits in harsh winter conditions far outweigh these longevity concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Significant improvement over all-season tires for winter handling
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Observations
- Users report excellent performance across a variety of vehicle types, including heavy SUVs like the BMW X5 and VW Touareg, as well as light trucks like the Ford F-150.
- Owners of hybrid vehicles noted that the tire's soft compound may wear more quickly under the specific torque characteristics of their vehicles.
- Some users successfully utilize oversized tire diameters for increased ground clearance in deep snow without sacrificing ride quality.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD | B · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 48 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD if dry matters most to you.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 50 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 82 vs 50 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 60 on wet.
BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD scores 100 vs 90 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.