63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
45 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD and Yokohama ADVAN Sport are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD is stronger on dry and handling. Yokohama ADVAN Sport is stronger on wet and comfort.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
g-Force T/A KD leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force T/A KD leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force T/A KD | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD | Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 64 |
| Dry | 100 | 79 |
| Wet | 60 | 70 |
| Comfort | 50 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 52 |
| Handling | 70 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD is highly regarded for its exceptional dry-weather performance and suitability for autocross applications. While users praise its grip and durability relative to its performance compound, it shows significant limitations in wet-weather conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and handling
- Strong performance in autocross environments
- Commendable tread life for a high-performance compound
Cons
- Poor performance in wet conditions
- Rapid tread wear when pushed to the limit
Observations
- Users report the tire remains effective for up to 10,000 miles before reaching significant wear levels.
- The compound is specifically noted as being well-suited for high-intensity driving scenarios like autocross.
The Yokohama ADVAN Sport is a polarizing high-performance tire that receives widely divergent feedback from users. While some drivers praise its sharp steering response, predictable feedback, and dry-weather grip, a significant portion of the user base reports severe dissatisfaction regarding excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.
Pros
- Excellent steering response and road feedback
- Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- High value for money when purchased at discounted or clearance pricing
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning concerns
- Harsh ride quality compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Users with luxury sedans (e.g., Audi A7, Volvo S60) frequently cited the tire as being too noisy and harsh for daily commuting.
- Owners of performance-oriented vehicles noted that while the tire performs well on the track, it often fails to meet longevity expectations for daily driving.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups reported faster-than-average tread degradation.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
BFGoodrich
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD and Yokohama ADVAN Sport are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD is stronger on dry and handling. Yokohama ADVAN Sport is stronger on wet and comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD scores 100 vs 79 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN Sport scores 70 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Sport scores 57 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD scores 70 vs 65 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.