Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Sumitomo HTR Z III tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
42 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
81
Snow
52
Comfort
89
Noise
87
Treadwear
82
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Sport

Summer Max Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Sport tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
45 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
70
Snow
–
Comfort
57
Noise
–
Treadwear
52
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Sumitomo HTR Z III — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 13
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
92
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport
79
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIADVAN Sport
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners 87 76
SimpleTire owners 95 100

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 11
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
81
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport
70
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIADVAN Sport
Tire Rack owners – 77
Tyre Reviews owners 80 66
SimpleTire owners 82 100

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
52
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport
–
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIADVAN Sport
SimpleTire owners 52 100

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 32
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
89
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport
57
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIADVAN Sport
Tire Rack owners – 76
Tyre Reviews owners 86 50
SimpleTire owners 91 100

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
87
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport
–
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIADVAN Sport
SimpleTire owners 87 100

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 30
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
82
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport
52
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIADVAN Sport
Tire Rack owners – 66
Tyre Reviews owners 82 47
SimpleTire owners 82 60

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 15
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
80
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport
65
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIADVAN Sport
Tyre Reviews owners 80 65

Scores at a glance

Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySumitomo HTR Z IIIYokohama ADVAN Sport
Relative Score 84 64
Dry 92 79
Wet 81 70
Snow 52 –
Comfort 89 57
Noise 87 –
Treadwear 82 52
Handling 80 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sumitomo HTR Z III

The Sumitomo H/TR Z III is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, comfort, and affordability. While it is frequently praised as a cost-effective alternative to premium brands for daily driving and spirited street use, some users note limitations in extreme wet-weather cornering and high-horsepower traction.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry handling and steering feedback
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Predictable performance for daily driving

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather side grip during cornering
  • Limited traction under heavy acceleration on high-horsepower vehicles
  • Not suitable for winter or freezing conditions
  • Variable tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight

Observations

  • High-horsepower RWD vehicles (e.g., 500whp Mustang) may experience significant wheel spin compared to premium performance tires.
  • Users with staggered setups report good longevity, though the inability to rotate tires can accelerate wear on the rear axle.
  • Owners of lighter, nimble vehicles like the Mini Cooper report high satisfaction with handling and wet-weather performance.
Tire B Yokohama ADVAN Sport

The Yokohama ADVAN Sport is a polarizing high-performance tire that receives widely divergent feedback from users. While some drivers praise its sharp steering response, predictable feedback, and dry-weather grip, a significant portion of the user base reports severe dissatisfaction regarding excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent steering response and road feedback
  • Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
  • Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
  • High value for money when purchased at discounted or clearance pricing

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning concerns
  • Harsh ride quality compared to premium competitors

Observations

  • Users with luxury sedans (e.g., Audi A7, Volvo S60) frequently cited the tire as being too noisy and harsh for daily commuting.
  • Owners of performance-oriented vehicles noted that while the tire performs well on the track, it often fails to meet longevity expectations for daily driving.
  • Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups reported faster-than-average tread degradation.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sumitomo HTR Z III B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport
Category—Summer Max Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG300 A A180 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Sumitomo

Yokohama

Winner: Sumitomo HTR Z III — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Sumitomo HTR Z III scores 89 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Sumitomo HTR Z III scores 82 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Sumitomo HTR Z III scores 80 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Sumitomo HTR Z III scores 92 vs 79 on dry.

Tire A · Sumitomo HTR Z III
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.