Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Sumitomo HTR Z III tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
42 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
81
Snow
52
Comfort
89
Noise
87
Treadwear
82
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Sumitomo HTR Z III — better dry, wet and noise. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if snow matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 15
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
92
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tyre Reviews owners 87 80
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 14
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
81
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tyre Reviews owners 80 73
SimpleTire owners 82 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 8
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
52
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 60
SimpleTire owners 52 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 9
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
89
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 86 90
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 11
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
87
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76
SimpleTire owners 87 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 11
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
82
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 82 80
SimpleTire owners 82 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) HTR Z III leads by 7
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
80
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 80 73

Scores at a glance

Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySumitomo HTR Z IIIYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 81 71
Dry 92 77
Wet 81 67
Snow 52 60
Comfort 89 80
Noise 87 76
Treadwear 82 71
Handling 80 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sumitomo HTR Z III

The Sumitomo H/TR Z III is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, comfort, and affordability. While it is frequently praised as a cost-effective alternative to premium brands for daily driving and spirited street use, some users note limitations in extreme wet-weather cornering and high-horsepower traction.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry handling and steering feedback
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Predictable performance for daily driving

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather side grip during cornering
  • Limited traction under heavy acceleration on high-horsepower vehicles
  • Not suitable for winter or freezing conditions
  • Variable tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight

Observations

  • High-horsepower RWD vehicles (e.g., 500whp Mustang) may experience significant wheel spin compared to premium performance tires.
  • Users with staggered setups report good longevity, though the inability to rotate tires can accelerate wear on the rear axle.
  • Owners of lighter, nimble vehicles like the Mini Cooper report high satisfaction with handling and wet-weather performance.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sumitomo HTR Z III B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG300 A A440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Sumitomo

Yokohama

Winner: Sumitomo HTR Z III — better dry, wet and noise. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Sumitomo HTR Z III scores 92 vs 77 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Sumitomo HTR Z III scores 81 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Sumitomo HTR Z III scores 87 vs 76 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Sumitomo HTR Z III scores 82 vs 71 on treadwear.

Tire A · Sumitomo HTR Z III
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.