Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Sumitomo HTR Z III tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
42 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
81
Snow
52
Comfort
89
Noise
87
Treadwear
82
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama AVID Ascend

Premium Touring All Season tire

Yokohama AVID Ascend tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
93
Snow
85
Comfort
89
Noise
88
Treadwear
90
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better snow, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Ascend leads by 3
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
92
B — Yokohama AVID Ascend
95
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
Tyre Reviews owners 87 80
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AVID Ascend leads by 12
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
81
B — Yokohama AVID Ascend
93
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
Tyre Reviews owners 80 80
SimpleTire owners 82 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Ascend leads by 33
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
52
B — Yokohama AVID Ascend
85
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners 52 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
89
B — Yokohama AVID Ascend
89
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
Tyre Reviews owners 86 70
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID Ascend leads by 1
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
87
B — Yokohama AVID Ascend
88
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
SimpleTire owners 87 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AVID Ascend leads by 8
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
82
B — Yokohama AVID Ascend
90
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
Tyre Reviews owners 82 95
SimpleTire owners 82 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Sumitomo HTR Z III
80
B — Yokohama AVID Ascend
80
Why this score
SourceHTR Z IIIAVID Ascend
Tyre Reviews owners 80 80

Scores at a glance

Sumitomo HTR Z III vs Yokohama AVID Ascend: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySumitomo HTR Z IIIYokohama AVID Ascend
Relative Score 81 89
Dry 92 95
Wet 81 93
Snow 52 85
Comfort 89 89
Noise 87 88
Treadwear 82 90
Handling 80 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sumitomo HTR Z III

The Sumitomo H/TR Z III is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, comfort, and affordability. While it is frequently praised as a cost-effective alternative to premium brands for daily driving and spirited street use, some users note limitations in extreme wet-weather cornering and high-horsepower traction.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry handling and steering feedback
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Predictable performance for daily driving

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather side grip during cornering
  • Limited traction under heavy acceleration on high-horsepower vehicles
  • Not suitable for winter or freezing conditions
  • Variable tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight

Observations

  • High-horsepower RWD vehicles (e.g., 500whp Mustang) may experience significant wheel spin compared to premium performance tires.
  • Users with staggered setups report good longevity, though the inability to rotate tires can accelerate wear on the rear axle.
  • Owners of lighter, nimble vehicles like the Mini Cooper report high satisfaction with handling and wet-weather performance.
Tire B Yokohama AVID Ascend

The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions

Cons

  • Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
  • Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
  • Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage

Observations

  • Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
  • Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
  • Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sumitomo HTR Z III B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
Category—Premium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″12/32″
UTQG300 A A740 A A
Treadwear warranty—75,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Sumitomo

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better snow, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 85 vs 52 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 81 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 90 vs 82 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 95 vs 92 on dry.

Tire A · Sumitomo HTR Z III
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.