83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
152 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
45 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 72 | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 64 |
| Dry | 91 | 79 |
| Wet | 85 | 70 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 84 | 57 |
| Noise | 92 | – |
| Treadwear | 78 | 52 |
| Handling | 79 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, wet weather confidence, and comfort at a competitive price point. While it excels in daily driving and spirited road use, some enthusiasts note limitations in steering precision and sidewall stiffness when pushed to the absolute limit on track or in aggressive cornering.
Pros
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier brands.
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet road conditions.
- Low road noise levels and high comfort for a performance tire.
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'floaty' feel or lack of steering feedback during aggressive maneuvers.
- Tread life is generally considered average to short, particularly for spirited drivers.
- Performance can degrade noticeably as the tire wears down, specifically regarding noise and wet grip.
- Not suitable for cold weather or near-freezing temperatures.
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Mustang GT, C5/C6 Corvette) report excellent straight-line hook but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates rear tread wear.
- Drivers of European sedans (BMW, Audi) appreciate the comfort and noise reduction compared to OEM run-flat tires, though some note the soft sidewall is less ideal for track-focused setups.
- Some users on 17-inch or smaller wheels report a firmer ride than expected, while those on larger diameters generally praise the balance of comfort and performance.
The Yokohama ADVAN Sport is a polarizing high-performance tire that receives widely divergent feedback from users. While some drivers praise its sharp steering response, predictable feedback, and dry-weather grip, a significant portion of the user base reports severe dissatisfaction regarding excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.
Pros
- Excellent steering response and road feedback
- Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- High value for money when purchased at discounted or clearance pricing
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning concerns
- Harsh ride quality compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Users with luxury sedans (e.g., Audi A7, Volvo S60) frequently cited the tire as being too noisy and harsh for daily commuting.
- Owners of performance-oriented vehicles noted that while the tire performs well on the track, it often fails to meet longevity expectations for daily driving.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups reported faster-than-average tread degradation.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Hankook
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 84 vs 57 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 78 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 85 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 79 vs 65 on handling.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.