Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO vs Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 60 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 57 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 73 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 64 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 93 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 50 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO | Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 74 |
| Dry | 83 | 67 |
| Wet | 80 | 66 |
| Snow | 66 | 82 |
| Comfort | 71 | 77 |
| Noise | 54 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 92 |
| Handling | 83 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is a polarizing winter tire that excels in wet and cold conditions but faces significant criticism regarding tread longevity and deep snow performance. While some users praise its handling and braking capabilities, others report rapid wear and diminished effectiveness as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance in wet and cold conditions
- Sharp steering response and handling characteristics
- Low noise levels when new
- Reliable traction in slushy environments
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short service life
- Below-average performance in deep snow compared to dedicated winter tires
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Diminished aquaplaning resistance over time
Observations
- Users reported premature wear issues on specific vehicles like the Subaru Forester, with some dealers advising against the fitment.
- The tire's soft compound, while beneficial for grip, leads to accelerated degradation when used in milder, dry winter conditions.
The Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 receives a largely negative consensus from users, who frequently report unpredictable handling and poor traction in wet and icy conditions. While some users acknowledge the tire's longevity and quiet operation, the lack of feedback and sudden loss of grip significantly undermine driver confidence.
Pros
- Quiet operation during normal driving
- Long tread life over multiple winter seasons
- Acceptable performance in fresh snow
Cons
- Dangerous loss of grip on wet and greasy road surfaces
- Poor performance and lack of traction on ice
- Sudden, unpredictable breakaway characteristics
- High susceptibility to aquaplaning
Observations
- Users report that the tire's performance limitations are consistent across both dry and wet asphalt conditions.
- The tire is noted as being outdated compared to newer iterations like the Pilot Alpin PA3 and PA4.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO | B · Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Michelin
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO and Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is stronger on handling, dry and wet. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 is stronger on treadwear, snow and comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 83 vs 50 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 scores 92 vs 65 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 83 vs 67 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 scores 82 vs 66 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.