75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
64/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 is stronger on treadwear and snow. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is stronger on handling and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 EVO leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 73 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 EVO leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 74 |
| Dry | 84 | 83 |
| Wet | 70 | 80 |
| Snow | 70 | 66 |
| Comfort | 72 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 54 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 65 |
| Handling | 69 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
74
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
- Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
- Robust construction and durability against road hazards
- Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
- Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
- Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration
Observations
- Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
- Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is a polarizing winter tire that excels in wet and cold conditions but faces significant criticism regarding tread longevity and deep snow performance. While some users praise its handling and braking capabilities, others report rapid wear and diminished effectiveness as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance in wet and cold conditions
- Sharp steering response and handling characteristics
- Low noise levels when new
- Reliable traction in slushy environments
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short service life
- Below-average performance in deep snow compared to dedicated winter tires
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Diminished aquaplaning resistance over time
Observations
- Users reported premature wear issues on specific vehicles like the Subaru Forester, with some dealers advising against the fitment.
- The tire's soft compound, while beneficial for grip, leads to accelerated degradation when used in milder, dry winter conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
74
/ 100
Bridgestone
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 is stronger on treadwear and snow. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is stronger on handling and wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 81 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 83 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 80 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 70 vs 66 on snow.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.