72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
64/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
96/100
35 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
110 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — better snow, comfort and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO if handling and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 77 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 95% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 91 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 84 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 100% | 91% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 72 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 91% | 96% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 91% | 99% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 74 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 64 | 63 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 EVO leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 59 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 EVO leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 EVO | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 75 |
| Dry | 83 | 84 |
| Wet | 80 | 88 |
| Snow | 66 | 77 |
| Comfort | 71 | 80 |
| Noise | 54 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 59 |
| Handling | 83 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 95% #7/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +1.5 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 98% #8/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | +1.8 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 87% #5/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | +0.1 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 97% #6/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | -2.1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 73% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 57% #7/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | +16.4 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 54% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #6/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | -46.1 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 60% #9/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 76% #15/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -15.4 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -83.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 91% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 96% #5/8 · 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | -5.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 91% #11/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 99% #6/8 · 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | -8.1 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 93% #5/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 96% #12/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -3.4 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0% #6/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 91% #1/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | +9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #10/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | -2.3 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is a polarizing winter tire that excels in wet and cold conditions but faces significant criticism regarding tread longevity and deep snow performance. While some users praise its handling and braking capabilities, others report rapid wear and diminished effectiveness as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance in wet and cold conditions
- Sharp steering response and handling characteristics
- Low noise levels when new
- Reliable traction in slushy environments
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short service life
- Below-average performance in deep snow compared to dedicated winter tires
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Diminished aquaplaning resistance over time
Observations
- Users reported premature wear issues on specific vehicles like the Subaru Forester, with some dealers advising against the fitment.
- The tire's soft compound, while beneficial for grip, leads to accelerated degradation when used in milder, dry winter conditions.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is widely regarded as a class-leading winter tire for wet and slushy conditions, offering exceptional grip and braking performance that rivals summer tires. While it performs reliably in fresh snow, user consensus indicates a significant decline in performance and tread life after the first two seasons, with many owners reporting premature wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance.
- Predictable and stable handling on dry roads.
- Strong performance in slush and fresh snow when new.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels during the initial phase of ownership.
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, often failing to last beyond 15,000–20,000 km.
- Significant performance degradation in snow and ice after the first or second season.
- Development of loud humming or buzzing noises as the tire ages.
- Reports of tread deformation, wobbly blocks, or uneven wear patterns.
Observations
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and large SUVs, appear to accelerate the rapid tread wear observed by many users.
- Users with RWD vehicles noted that while the tire is predictable, it can struggle with traction on steep inclines once the tread depth drops below 5mm.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or heavier cars reported noticeable understeer during spirited driving in dry conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 11 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Bridgestone
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — better snow, comfort and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO if handling and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 77 vs 66 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 83 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 80 vs 71 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 63 vs 54 on noise.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.