Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 79 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 73 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 10 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 81 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 33 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 70 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 66 |
| Dry | 83 | 79 |
| Wet | 82 | 73 |
| Snow | 77 | 10 |
| Comfort | 70 | 81 |
| Noise | 36 | – |
| Treadwear | 78 | 70 |
| Handling | 76 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, offering drivers significant confidence in adverse weather. While it receives high praise for its traction and handling, user experiences are polarized regarding its longevity, noise levels, and performance on wet or dry pavement.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
- Reliable braking performance in severe weather
- Satisfactory comfort levels for a dedicated winter tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- High noise levels on dry asphalt
- Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance on certain vehicle types
Observations
- High-torque or high-performance vehicles (e.g., DB11, tuned GTI) may experience increased traction control intervention or accelerated wear.
- Compatibility issues noted with specific AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester, where premature wear was reported.
The Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 receives highly polarized feedback, with users divided between those who find it a top-tier performance winter tire and those who report significant traction failures in snow and ice. While many praise its comfort, quietness, and wet-weather handling, a notable subset of reviewers experienced poor grip in winter conditions, leading to inconsistent performance reports.
Pros
- Excellent comfort and low noise levels
- Strong performance in wet and cold conditions
- Reliable handling and traction on dry tarmac
- High-quality compound offering superior braking and cornering for some users
Cons
- Inconsistent and sometimes dangerous traction on snow and ice
- Vague steering feedback on tarmac
- Performance degradation in warmer temperatures
- High price point relative to some competitors
Observations
- Users noted that the tire performs best in cold temperatures and loses its 'sticky' feel when ambient temperatures rise.
- Some users reported that the tire's performance is highly dependent on specific road conditions, with some finding it superior to Michelin Alpin and Continental alternatives, while others found it inferior to Nokian products.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Goodyear
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 if comfort matters most to you.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 77 vs 10 on snow.
Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 scores 81 vs 70 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 82 vs 73 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 78 vs 70 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.