76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
96/100
35 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
110 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Yokohama W.drive V905 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama W.drive V905 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if snow, wet and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
W.drive V905 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 88 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 83 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 63 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 75 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 63 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
W.drive V905 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 64 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
W.drive V905 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | Yokohama W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 81 |
| Dry | 84 | 88 |
| Wet | 88 | 83 |
| Snow | 77 | 63 |
| Comfort | 80 | 75 |
| Noise | 63 | – |
| Treadwear | 59 | 86 |
| Handling | 73 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is widely regarded as a class-leading winter tire for wet and slushy conditions, offering exceptional grip and braking performance that rivals summer tires. While it performs reliably in fresh snow, user consensus indicates a significant decline in performance and tread life after the first two seasons, with many owners reporting premature wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance.
- Predictable and stable handling on dry roads.
- Strong performance in slush and fresh snow when new.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels during the initial phase of ownership.
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, often failing to last beyond 15,000–20,000 km.
- Significant performance degradation in snow and ice after the first or second season.
- Development of loud humming or buzzing noises as the tire ages.
- Reports of tread deformation, wobbly blocks, or uneven wear patterns.
Observations
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and large SUVs, appear to accelerate the rapid tread wear observed by many users.
- Users with RWD vehicles noted that while the tire is predictable, it can struggle with traction on steep inclines once the tread depth drops below 5mm.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or heavier cars reported noticeable understeer during spirited driving in dry conditions.
The Yokohama W drive V905 is generally regarded as a reliable, high-value winter tire that excels in snow and cold-weather traction. While most users praise its longevity and confidence-inspiring handling, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding cabin noise and inconsistent performance in specific wet-weather conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and confidence in deep and fresh snow
- Impressive tread life and durability over multiple winter seasons
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable handling characteristics that provide good driver feedback
Cons
- Higher-than-average road noise levels at highway speeds
- Mixed performance in wet conditions, with some reports of aquaplaning sensitivity
- Potential for reduced grip when temperatures rise above 10-15°C
Observations
- Owners of rear-wheel-drive (RWD) vehicles, such as the BMW 3-series, reported surprisingly strong snow performance.
- Users noted the tire remains robust and structurally sound even when encountering significant road hazards like potholes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | B · Yokohama W.drive V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Ultra High Performance Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Bridgestone
81
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama W.drive V905 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if snow, wet and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 86 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 77 vs 63 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 83 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 88 vs 83 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire B · Yokohama W.drive V905
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 also compared with
Yokohama W.drive V905 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.