Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs Yokohama W.drive V905 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Winter Premium Touring tires

Kumho WinterCraft WP71 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
61/100
17 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
73
Snow
85
Comfort
51
Noise
10
Treadwear
73
Handling
53

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama W.drive V905

Ultra High Performance Winter tire

Yokohama W.drive V905 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
17 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
83
Snow
63
Comfort
75
Noise
–
Treadwear
86
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama W.drive V905 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 if snow matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) W.drive V905 leads by 8
A — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
80
B — Yokohama W.drive V905
88
Why this score
SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 67 88

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) W.drive V905 leads by 10
A — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
73
B — Yokohama W.drive V905
83
Why this score
SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 61 83

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterCraft WP71 leads by 22
A — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
85
B — Yokohama W.drive V905
63
Why this score
SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
Professional tests (TWG score) 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 78 63

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) W.drive V905 leads by 24
A — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
51
B — Yokohama W.drive V905
75
Why this score
SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
Tyre Reviews owners 51 75

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
10
B — Yokohama W.drive V905
–
Why this score
SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
Professional tests (TWG score) 10 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) W.drive V905 leads by 13
A — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
73
B — Yokohama W.drive V905
86
Why this score
SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
Tyre Reviews owners 73 86

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) W.drive V905 leads by 30
A — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
53
B — Yokohama W.drive V905
83
Why this score
SourceWinterCraft WP71W.drive V905
Tyre Reviews owners 53 83

Scores at a glance

Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs Yokohama W.drive V905: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho WinterCraft WP71Yokohama W.drive V905
Relative Score 70 81
Dry 80 88
Wet 73 83
Snow 85 63
Comfort 51 75
Noise 10 –
Treadwear 73 86
Handling 53 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho WinterCraft WP71

The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 receives a polarized reception, with users frequently praising its competent snow and slush performance while expressing significant dissatisfaction regarding road noise and wet-weather handling. While some drivers find it a capable budget-friendly winter option, others report vague steering feedback and a lack of confidence in cornering, particularly on wet surfaces.

Pros

  • Strong traction and braking performance in deep snow and slush
  • Competitive price point compared to premium winter tire alternatives
  • Predictable handling in dry winter conditions
  • Generally satisfactory tread wear longevity

Cons

  • Excessive road noise, particularly at low to moderate speeds
  • Vague or 'spongy' steering feedback and handling characteristics
  • Inconsistent lateral grip and understeer issues on wet roads
  • Poor performance on ice compared to premium competitors

Observations

  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Mazda 3 MPS, reported significant handling instability and a lack of precision.
  • AWD vehicle owners, such as those with a Kia Sportage, reported higher satisfaction with snow and ice traction than those with FWD setups.
Tire B Yokohama W.drive V905

The Yokohama W drive V905 is generally regarded as a reliable, high-value winter tire that excels in snow and cold-weather traction. While most users praise its longevity and confidence-inspiring handling, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding cabin noise and inconsistent performance in specific wet-weather conditions.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and confidence in deep and fresh snow
  • Impressive tread life and durability over multiple winter seasons
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable handling characteristics that provide good driver feedback

Cons

  • Higher-than-average road noise levels at highway speeds
  • Mixed performance in wet conditions, with some reports of aquaplaning sensitivity
  • Potential for reduced grip when temperatures rise above 10-15°C

Observations

  • Owners of rear-wheel-drive (RWD) vehicles, such as the BMW 3-series, reported surprisingly strong snow performance.
  • Users noted the tire remains robust and structurally sound even when encountering significant road hazards like potholes.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho WinterCraft WP71 B · Yokohama W.drive V905
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tiresUltra High Performance Winter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama W.drive V905 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 83 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 75 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho WinterCraft WP71 scores 85 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama W.drive V905 scores 86 vs 73 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Tire B · Yokohama W.drive V905

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.