Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Falken Eurowinter HS01 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken Eurowinter HS01

Winter Premium Touring tires

Falken Eurowinter HS01 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
14 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
35 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
87
Snow
82
Comfort
42
Noise
82
Treadwear
90
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Winter Premium Touring tires

Kumho WinterCraft WP71 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
61/100
17 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
73
Snow
85
Comfort
51
Noise
10
Treadwear
73
Handling
53

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken Eurowinter HS01 — better noise, handling and treadwear. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 if comfort and snow matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 9
A — Falken Eurowinter HS01
89
B — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
80
Why this score
SourceEurowinter HS01WinterCraft WP71
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 89
Tyre Reviews owners 88 67
SimpleTire owners 98 –
Dry Braking (% of best) 97% 99%
Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 97%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 14
A — Falken Eurowinter HS01
87
B — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
73
Why this score
SourceEurowinter HS01WinterCraft WP71
Professional tests (TWG score) 83 81
Tyre Reviews owners 89 61
SimpleTire owners 97 –
Wet Braking (% of best) 99% 93%
Wet Handling (% of best) 98% 97%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterCraft WP71 leads by 3
A — Falken Eurowinter HS01
82
B — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
85
Why this score
SourceEurowinter HS01WinterCraft WP71
Professional tests (TWG score) 79 90
Tyre Reviews owners 83 78
SimpleTire owners 96 –
Snow Braking (% of best) 97% 97%
Snow Handling (% of best) 96% 97%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterCraft WP71 leads by 9
A — Falken Eurowinter HS01
42
B — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
51
Why this score
SourceEurowinter HS01WinterCraft WP71
Professional tests (TWG score) 12 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 51
SimpleTire owners 98 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 72
A — Falken Eurowinter HS01
82
B — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
10
Why this score
SourceEurowinter HS01WinterCraft WP71
Professional tests (TWG score) 76 10
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 17
A — Falken Eurowinter HS01
90
B — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
73
Why this score
SourceEurowinter HS01WinterCraft WP71
Tyre Reviews owners 88 73
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS01 leads by 23
A — Falken Eurowinter HS01
76
B — Kumho WinterCraft WP71
53
Why this score
SourceEurowinter HS01WinterCraft WP71
Tyre Reviews owners 76 53

Scores at a glance

Falken Eurowinter HS01 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Eurowinter HS01Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Relative Score 80 63
Dry 89 80
Wet 87 73
Snow 82 85
Comfort 42 51
Noise 82 10
Treadwear 90 73
Handling 76 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 97% #6/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 99% #2/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test -2.1 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #7/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 97% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test +2.3 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 77% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 74% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test +2.7 Different tests
Noise Other 97% #9/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 92% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test +5.2 Different tests
Price Other 86% #14/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 63% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test +22.5 Different tests
Value Other 69% #10/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 89% #13/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test -19.6 Different tests
Wear Other 56% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 69% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test -12.9 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 3% #30/48 · 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test 5% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test -1.7 Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 97% #5/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test 97% #15/30 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview +0.2 Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 96% #5/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test 97% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test -1.2 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 100% #1/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test 93% #8/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test +7.4 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #20/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 0% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 99% #2/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test 93% #7/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview +6.4 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #6/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test 97% #8/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test +0.9 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken Eurowinter HS01

The Falken Eurowinter HS01 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that punches above its price point, offering impressive performance in wet, snowy, and icy conditions. While a small minority of users report mixed results regarding wet-weather braking confidence, the vast majority of owners praise its quiet ride, durability, and reliable traction in challenging winter climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong traction and handling in deep snow and ice
  • High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride for a winter tire
  • Good tread longevity and durability

Cons

  • Higher rolling resistance noted by some users
  • Inconsistent braking confidence on wet or slick asphalt for a small subset of drivers
  • Increased road noise at higher speeds or when over-inflated
  • Dry road handling is described as adequate but not performance-oriented

Observations

  • Users with AWD vehicles (e.g., WRX, Ford Kuga) report that the tire complements all-wheel-drive systems effectively for snow navigation.
  • Drivers noted that the tire maintains comfort and low noise levels even on rough road surfaces, particularly when moving from 15-inch to 16-inch wheel sizes.
Tire B Kumho WinterCraft WP71

The Kumho WinterCraft WP71 receives a polarized reception, with users frequently praising its competent snow and slush performance while expressing significant dissatisfaction regarding road noise and wet-weather handling. While some drivers find it a capable budget-friendly winter option, others report vague steering feedback and a lack of confidence in cornering, particularly on wet surfaces.

Pros

  • Strong traction and braking performance in deep snow and slush
  • Competitive price point compared to premium winter tire alternatives
  • Predictable handling in dry winter conditions
  • Generally satisfactory tread wear longevity

Cons

  • Excessive road noise, particularly at low to moderate speeds
  • Vague or 'spongy' steering feedback and handling characteristics
  • Inconsistent lateral grip and understeer issues on wet roads
  • Poor performance on ice compared to premium competitors

Observations

  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Mazda 3 MPS, reported significant handling instability and a lack of precision.
  • AWD vehicle owners, such as those with a Kia Sportage, reported higher satisfaction with snow and ice traction than those with FWD setups.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Eurowinter HS01 B · Kumho WinterCraft WP71
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tiresWinter Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available21—
Rim diameters17″ – 20″—
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Kumho

Winner: Falken Eurowinter HS01 — better noise, handling and treadwear. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 if comfort and snow matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 82 vs 10 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 76 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 90 vs 73 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 87 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Falken Eurowinter HS01
Tire B · Kumho WinterCraft WP71

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.