75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
96/100
35 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
110 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Falken Eurowinter HS01 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
14 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
35 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Falken Eurowinter HS01 — better treadwear, noise and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS01 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 98 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 89 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 100% | 95% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 100% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 94% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS01 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 96 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 91% | 94% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 96% | 96% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 95% | 88% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 12 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 98 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS01 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 63 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS01 leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 64 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS01 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | Falken Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 80 |
| Dry | 84 | 89 |
| Wet | 88 | 87 |
| Snow | 77 | 82 |
| Comfort | 80 | 42 |
| Noise | 63 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 90 |
| Handling | 73 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #2/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 98% #9/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +0.6 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/10 · 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 99% #6/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 84% #2/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 88% #11/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | -3.8 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #4/9 · 2023 Tyre Reviews SUV Winter Tyre Test | 97% #8/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | -2.1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 85% #6/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | 68% #3/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | +17.1 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 100% #15/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 56% #6/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +44.3 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 75% #14/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 91% #7/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -15.7 | Same test |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 100% #1/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 8% #13/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +92.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 91% #1/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 94% #7/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | -3.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 96% #5/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | -0.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 95% #12/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 88% #9/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | +7.8 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 90% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 60% #10/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +30 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 97% #2/8 · 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 80% #4/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +16.7 | Different tests |
| Subj. Snow Handling | Subj | 90% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 40% #9/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +50 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 30% #9/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +70 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #12/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0% #17/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 95% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +5.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 100% #1/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | 96% #7/10 · 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +3.6 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | 94% #12/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | +6.4 | Same test |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is widely regarded as a class-leading winter tire for wet and slushy conditions, offering exceptional grip and braking performance that rivals summer tires. While it performs reliably in fresh snow, user consensus indicates a significant decline in performance and tread life after the first two seasons, with many owners reporting premature wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance.
- Predictable and stable handling on dry roads.
- Strong performance in slush and fresh snow when new.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels during the initial phase of ownership.
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, often failing to last beyond 15,000–20,000 km.
- Significant performance degradation in snow and ice after the first or second season.
- Development of loud humming or buzzing noises as the tire ages.
- Reports of tread deformation, wobbly blocks, or uneven wear patterns.
Observations
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and large SUVs, appear to accelerate the rapid tread wear observed by many users.
- Users with RWD vehicles noted that while the tire is predictable, it can struggle with traction on steep inclines once the tread depth drops below 5mm.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or heavier cars reported noticeable understeer during spirited driving in dry conditions.
The Falken Eurowinter HS01 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that punches above its price point, offering impressive performance in wet, snowy, and icy conditions. While a small minority of users report mixed results regarding wet-weather braking confidence, the vast majority of owners praise its quiet ride, durability, and reliable traction in challenging winter climates.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Strong traction and handling in deep snow and ice
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride for a winter tire
- Good tread longevity and durability
Cons
- Higher rolling resistance noted by some users
- Inconsistent braking confidence on wet or slick asphalt for a small subset of drivers
- Increased road noise at higher speeds or when over-inflated
- Dry road handling is described as adequate but not performance-oriented
Observations
- Users with AWD vehicles (e.g., WRX, Ford Kuga) report that the tire complements all-wheel-drive systems effectively for snow navigation.
- Drivers noted that the tire maintains comfort and low noise levels even on rough road surfaces, particularly when moving from 15-inch to 16-inch wheel sizes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | B · Falken Eurowinter HS01 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | 21 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
80
/ 100
Falken
Winner: Falken Eurowinter HS01 — better treadwear, noise and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 80 vs 42 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 90 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 82 vs 63 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 89 vs 84 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire B · Falken Eurowinter HS01
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 also compared with
Falken Eurowinter HS01 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.